Influence of clinical context on interpretation and use of an advance care planning policy: a qualitative study

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning is a process through which people share their values, goals and preferences regarding future medical treatments with the purpose of aligning care received with patient wishes. The objective of this study was to explore perspectives from patients and clinicians in 4 clinical settings to understand how context influences interpretation and application of advance care planning processes. Methods:This study used a qualitative interpretive descriptive design. Patient and clinician participants were recruited across 4 clinical outpatient settings (cancer, heart failure, renal failure and supportive living) in Calgary and Edmonton. Data were collected between 2014 and 2015 by means of recorded one-on-one semistructured interviews. We analyzed the data using thematic analysis in 2016-2017.Results: Thirty-four patients and 34 clinicians participated in interviews. Themes common to all 4 contexts were lack of shared understanding between patients and clinicians, and a lack of consistent clinical process related to advance care planning. Advance care planning understanding and process varied substantially between contexts. This variation seemed to be driven by differences in perceptions around disease burden and the nature of the physician-patient relationship.Interpretation: Provision of a system-wide policy and procedural framework alone was not found to be sufficient to form a standardized approach to advance care planning, as considerable variability existed in advance care planning process between and within clinical settings. Quality-improvement methods that consider local processes, gaps and barriers can help in developing a consistent, comprehensive process. Abstract ResearchE10 CMAJ OPEN, 8(1) OPEN CMAJ OPEN, 8(1) E11

Clinicians’ Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program

“…Clinical contexts, 36 including staff, organization, process, 37 and patient factors, 38 are known to have implications for conversations about serious illness and the uptake and sustainability of practice changes. Our findings highlight that the multifaceted design of the SICP, especially the system-change components (the presence of a unit champion, the accessibility of the guide within units, and the formalized documentation procedure), supported behavior change among clinicians.…”

Patient and caregiver experiences with advanced cancer care: a qualitative study informing the development of an early palliative care pathway

“…26 Most participants in our study had not discussed advance care planning with their care team, and therefore participant readiness for advance care planning discussions was mixed. Limited knowledge may impact timing of advance care planning discussions, a finding also mentioned by Shaw et al 32 Advance care planning discussions need to be individualised to the patient. 33 An early palliative approach to care needs to embody patient and family engagement.…”

Efficacy of Advance Care Planning Videos for Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Cancer, Heart, and Kidney Failure Outpatient Settings

“…For all these reasons, health care providers must play an active role in serious illness conversations, although the considerable variability of ACP understanding and processes between and within clinical contexts adds further complexity. 46 Two systematic reviews on ACP video decision aids 30,44 called for studies evaluating the videos' effectiveness when integrated into clinical care:…”

“…For all these reasons, health care providers must play an active role in serious illness conversations, although the considerable variability of ACP understanding and processes between and within clinical contexts adds further complexity. 46…”