Influence of climate, soil, and land cover on plant species distribution in the European Alps

Abstract

Although the importance of edaphic factors and habitat structure for plant growth and survival is known, both are often neglected in favor of climatic drivers when investigating the spatial patterns of plant species and diversity. Yet, especially in mountain ecosystems with complex topography, missing edaphic and habitat components may be detrimental for a sound understanding of biodiversity distribution. Here, we compare the relative importance of climate, soil and land cover variables when predicting the distributions of 2,616 vascular plant species in the European Alps, representing approximately two-thirds of all European flora. Using presence-only data, we built point-process models (PPMs) to relate species observations to different combinations of covariates. We evaluated the PPMs through block crossvalidations and assessed the independent contributions of climate, soil, and land cover covariates to predict plant species distributions using an innovative predictive partitioning approach. We found climate to be the most influential driver of spatial patterns in plant species with a relative influence of~58.5% across all species, with decreasing importance from low to high elevations. Soil (~20.1%) and land cover (~21.4%), overall, were less influential than climate, but increased in importance along the elevation gradient. Furthermore, land cover showed strong local effects in lowlands, while the contribution of soil stabilized at mid-elevations. The decreasing influence of climate with elevation is explained by increasing endemism, and the fact that climate becomes more homogeneous as habitat diversity declines at higher altitudes. In contrast, soil predictors were found to follow the opposite trend. Additionally, at low elevations, human-mediated land cover effects appear to reduce the importance of climate predictors. We conclude that soil and land cover are, like climate, principal drivers of plant species distribution in the European Alps. While disentangling their effects remains a challenge, future studies can benefit markedly by including soil and land cover effects when predicting species distributions.

Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in Mixed-Deciduous and Coniferous Forests in Austria

“…Moreover, in a common setting in Central Europe the distribution of tree species is not primarily driven by the expected formation of a stock of soil organic carbon but rather by management decisions of forest practitioners. Niche models are a powerful tool for the prediction of future tree species compositions that are based on site conditions and to some extent on the competitive advantages of different tree species (Zimmermann et al, 2009;Chauvier et al, 2021). Yet, forest management decisions are not reflected.…”

Multi‐decadal land use impacts across the vast range of an iconic threatened species

“…Our modelling approach combined multi-temporal occurrence records with year-specific land use/cover data to assess range change and potential drivers of distribution. There is a growing realization of the important role that land cover data plays within species distribution modelling (Chauvier et al, 2021;Kort et al, 2020), especially at different temporal and spatial scales as a proxy for key processes of ecosystem functioning controlling species distribution and abundance patterns (Arenas-Castro et al, 2019). However, incorporating time series of land cover data has followed different approaches, for example, by calculating seasonal variation in land cover (or vegetation indices) at occurrence points (e.g.…”

Novel methods to correct for observer and sampling bias in presence‐only species distribution models

“…How to cite this article: Chauvier, Y., Zimmermann N. E., Poggiato G., Bystrova D., Brun P., & Thuiller W. (2021). Novel methods to correct for observer and sampling bias in presence-only species distribution models.…”