2004
DOI: 10.1051/water/20043501011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of clay suspensions on scaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SQCM also showed that kaolinite had little influence on the scaling propensity of water. A slowdown of nucleation kinetics was also observed in the presence of clay suspensions (Hui et al, 2004).…”
Section: Natural Water Vs Synthetic Watermentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SQCM also showed that kaolinite had little influence on the scaling propensity of water. A slowdown of nucleation kinetics was also observed in the presence of clay suspensions (Hui et al, 2004).…”
Section: Natural Water Vs Synthetic Watermentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The surface charges of these elements could play a role in those mechanisms. For example, Hui et al showed that the antiscaling effect of clays is maximum if the clay displays the maximum quantity of suspended materials as well as a highly negative zeta (ζ) potential (Hui et al, 2004). Figure 6B shows a comparison of the mass change of scale deposition for Salvetat water (curve a) and Salvetat water diluted at 50% (curve b).…”
Section: Natural Water Vs Synthetic Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronoamperometry was used to examine the MF effect on the heterogeneous calcium carbonate precipitation on stainless steel for different magnetization times. It consists of precipitating calcium carbonate on a metallic surface by applying a cathodic potential (−1 V/SCE) [53,54] . The potential generates O 2 reduction according to the following electrochemical reaction (Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments were performed at 30 °C and 60 °C (Figure 2A and B). To compare the scaling potentiality of each tested solution untreated and treated by the MF, two scaling parameters were extrapolated from chronoamperometric results: the scaling time, t s , corresponds to the intersection between the tangent of the decreasing linear part of the curve and the time axis and the scaling rate, r s , is determined from the slope of the linear part of the current‐time curve [53,56] . The inhibition efficiency, E CA , of the magnetic treatment was also calculated from the chronoamperometry measurement according to the following equation (Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation