2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of charge shape and point of detonation of high explosive cylinders detonated on ground surface on blast-resistant design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, spherical equivalence factors have been derived for a range of cylindrical charges (L D / = 0.2-5.0) by equating plate deformations using finite element analysis (Rigby et al, 2021). Cylindrical blast parameters have also been shown to be dependent on initiation location and recent studies have shown that pressure can be enhanced by up to a factor of 3.0 for centrally-detonated cylinders (Hu et al, 2018;Xiao et al, 2020aXiao et al, , 2020b. Wisotski and Snyer (1965).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, spherical equivalence factors have been derived for a range of cylindrical charges (L D / = 0.2-5.0) by equating plate deformations using finite element analysis (Rigby et al, 2021). Cylindrical blast parameters have also been shown to be dependent on initiation location and recent studies have shown that pressure can be enhanced by up to a factor of 3.0 for centrally-detonated cylinders (Hu et al, 2018;Xiao et al, 2020aXiao et al, , 2020b. Wisotski and Snyer (1965).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that differences between cylindrical and spherical blast parameters persist to a distance of Z ~4 m/kg 1/3 (Sherkar et al, 2016;Simoens and Lefebvre, 2015;Xiao et al, 2020b), however there is currently a lack of robust understanding of the early and mid stages of blast wave propagation following detonation of a non-spherical charge. This stems from a dearth of experimental data or studies of near-field blast loading, with very few studies reporting experimental results for non-spherical charges at scaled distances less than 1.24 m/kg 1/3 (Shi and Stewart, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charge shape effects were significant, increasing both the overpressure and impulse for Z < 8 m/kg 1/3 . Xiao et al (15) performed similar work to the free air simulations reported in reference (11), comparing hemispherical charge and cylindrical charge detonations on the ground. The model results were validated using the data presented by Tancreto (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although surface bursts are frequent in practice, most studies consider free air detonations (for example, references (6) (7) (9) (8), (11) (12)) while relatively few focus on surface bursts (13) (14) (15) (16). Guerke and Scheklinski-Gluek (13) performed tests on cylinders of RDX (D/H=0.2 and D/H=1) inclined at different angles to the ground for 0.5 m/kg 1/3 < Z < 32 m/kg 1/3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the near-field and mid-field, peak overpressure and impulse are significantly affected by charge shape and point of detonation, in comparison to those produced by a spherical charge of the same mass detonated from the centre. Through numerical analysis, Xiao et al (2020) found that for near-field explosions, neglecting the effect of the cylindrical charge shape can result in an underestimation of peak overpressure by a factor as high 6.6, and maximum impulse by a factor as high as 2.0. It was also found that the shock front generated by cylindrical charges smooths as scaled distance increases, eventually transitioning into hemispherical in the far-field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%