1965
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(196511)18:11<1474::aid-cncr2820181117>3.0.co;2-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cell collection techniques upon cytological diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, all participants had biopsies taken. If the VIA examination was negative, biopsies were taken at 10 and 2 o'clock [15]. If both VIA and colposcopy were positive, biopsies were taken only in the abnormal area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, all participants had biopsies taken. If the VIA examination was negative, biopsies were taken at 10 and 2 o'clock [15]. If both VIA and colposcopy were positive, biopsies were taken only in the abnormal area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During 50 years after the first publications on cervical screening1 2 and 30 years after the initial method of vaginal aspiration was abandoned3 several studies assessed the relative value of newer sampling methods. However, because of lack of statistical significance resulting from variations in the designs of the studies and small numbers in many we still do not know which sampling device is best.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Possible sources of error include variability among sample takers, cellcollection techniques employed, inadequate screening, and errors in interpretation. If one focuses on sampling and slide preparation methods, several studies have shown that the majority of the cellular sample remains on the collecting device(s) and is discarded after a conventional smear is made.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%