2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20133246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Comorbidities, Medication Use and Procedural Variables on Remote Ischemic Conditioning Efficacy in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) confers cardioprotection in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite intense research, the translation of RIC into clinical practice remains a challenge. This may, at least partly, be due to confounding factors that may modify the efficacy of RIC. The present review focuses on cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, medication use and procedural variables which may modify the efficacy of RIC in patients with STEMI. Findings of such efficac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(137 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of ischemic conditioning can be applied locally on the heart as ischemic preconditioning (IPC) or as remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), which is a more clinically applicable approach [ 10 ]. IPC and RIC have shown substantial cardioprotective effect in preclinical studies, but translating the favourable effect to significant clinical benefits remains challenging [ 11 , 12 ]. Most preclinical studies have been performed in healthy young animals that do not represent the complex nature of a clinical population suffering from acute myocardial infarction [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of ischemic conditioning can be applied locally on the heart as ischemic preconditioning (IPC) or as remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), which is a more clinically applicable approach [ 10 ]. IPC and RIC have shown substantial cardioprotective effect in preclinical studies, but translating the favourable effect to significant clinical benefits remains challenging [ 11 , 12 ]. Most preclinical studies have been performed in healthy young animals that do not represent the complex nature of a clinical population suffering from acute myocardial infarction [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction is affected by a variety of factors [21] . In this study, there were no signi cant differences in age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors between the two groups of patients with myocardial infarction, except S-TO-B, which were signi cant differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the STEMI population in Saudi Arabia, the current study indicated a high prevalence of coronary artery disease risk factors in a younger age group, compared to other registries. It also highlighted a high prevalence of DM, HTN, and smoking, and controlling these risks is crucial for the prevention of acute coronary syndromes [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%