2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of carbonate impurities on smartwater effect: Evaluation of wettability alteration process by geochemical simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of the temperature on emulsion formation and stability remains unclear, and the investigation of the emulsion formation process, which significantly influences emulsion stability, has often been overlooked. Some studies have attributed shifts in emulsion stability to changes in viscosity or interfacial tension. ,,,, However, changes in interfacial tension with the temperature have been inconsistent across different publications, likely as a result of variations in crude oil properties. Asphaltenes and resins, with their functional group content, are considered the natural surface-active agents in crude oils. , Liu et al reported that emulsion stability increased initially as a result of the synergistic effect between asphaltenes and resins with the increasing resin concentration and then decreased, which aligns with previous studies. , In contrast, Pu et al demonstrated the effect of resin/asphaltene on the stability of emulsions formed by simulated oils, showing variations with aging time . A deeper understanding of the impact of crude oil properties on emulsion stability is still needed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The impact of the temperature on emulsion formation and stability remains unclear, and the investigation of the emulsion formation process, which significantly influences emulsion stability, has often been overlooked. Some studies have attributed shifts in emulsion stability to changes in viscosity or interfacial tension. ,,,, However, changes in interfacial tension with the temperature have been inconsistent across different publications, likely as a result of variations in crude oil properties. Asphaltenes and resins, with their functional group content, are considered the natural surface-active agents in crude oils. , Liu et al reported that emulsion stability increased initially as a result of the synergistic effect between asphaltenes and resins with the increasing resin concentration and then decreased, which aligns with previous studies. , In contrast, Pu et al demonstrated the effect of resin/asphaltene on the stability of emulsions formed by simulated oils, showing variations with aging time . A deeper understanding of the impact of crude oil properties on emulsion stability is still needed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ ions, which are known to strongly interact at the COBR interface, were assumed at the inner layer, with a net charge transfer to the outer layer (1-plane or Δ Z 1 ). The values used for the Δ Z i in Table were sourced from the work by Hao et al, which were based on the understanding of the calcite–brine lattice. ,, The calcite–brine interface was equilibrated with calcite mineral and atmospheric CO 2 , i.e., partial pressure of 10 –3.4 atm. However, the oil–brine interface was only equilibrated with atmospheric CO 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorption Reaction, Constants (log K), and Charge Distribution Used for the TLM-Based SCM at 25 °Careaction ΔZ o * ΔZ 1 * ΔZ 2 * Log(K)calcite−brine interface67,80,86,87 ( site density = 4.95 sites/nm 2 ,11,21,26,34 specific surface area = 1 m 2 /g11,34 ) >CaOH + H + ↔>CaOH 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, zeta potentials obtained for EST2 are less negative for SWd40 and SW-SO4 and more positive for FMB than those obtained for EST1. This variation can be related to differences in rock texture or the presence of impurities [49,55,56], as the calculated zeta potential represents a macroscopic weighted average that accounts for the magnitude and distribution of microscopic zeta potentials arising at each mineral surfaces (Figure 7). It can also be related to the difference in the composition of the solutions after interaction with the intact sample, as some variations in pH, conductivity and viscosity were observed ( Table 4).…”
Section: Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%