Abstract:Triple‐base gun propellants composed of nitrocellulose (NC), triethylene glycol dinitrate (TEGDN) and cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX) with carbon nanofibers (CNFs) were studied to explore the effects of CNFs on the thermal and mechanical properties. The results indicated that CNFs with less than 0.50 wt % were evenly and randomly dispersed in the propellant, otherwise there existed obvious aggregation. Temperatures of initial decomposition and exothermic peak reduced with the increase of NCFs from 0.00 to … Show more
“…In principle, the addition of carbon fibers might also affect the heat transfer in the composites. − The thermal conductivity of carbon fiber can vary widely from ∼10 to ∼1000 W·m –1 ·K –1 , while the value of carbon fibers used in this study is estimated to be ∼10–20 W·m –1 ·K –1 . , A ∼2.5 wt % addition of the carbon fibers, however, should not appreciably increase the calculated overall thermal conductivity/diffusivity, until a fiber conductivity of at least ∼250 W·m –1 ·K –1 (∼aluminum’s thermal conductivity), as shown in Figure S3 and Table S4. Although the addition of carbon fibers might not increase the overall thermal conductivity of the composites, conductive heat transfer from hot burned/burning particles to the unburnt materials via these fibers might be quite efficient, especially in the case where the carbon fibers themselves create a connective network (Figure d) .…”
Section: Results
and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Although the addition of carbon fibers might not increase the overall thermal conductivity of the composites, conductive heat transfer from hot burned/burning particles to the unburnt materials via these fibers might be quite efficient, especially in the case where the carbon fibers themselves create a connective network (Figure d) . However, while the average conductivity might not be substantially impacted (because of its small mass fraction in the composite), the fact remains that the fibers have a much higher thermal conductivity (>10 W·m –1 ·K –1 ) than the polymer matrix (∼0.2 W·m –1 ·K –1 ) and the surrounding gas (∼0.02 W·m –1 ·K –1 ), ,− which provides 10× higher overall thermal conductivity (see detailed calculations in Figure S4 and Table S5) through the gas/carbon fiber combination route (0.17 W·m –1 ·K –1 , Table S5), compared to those via just gas heat transfer (0.017 W·m –1 ·K –1 , Table S5). It is also reasonable to expect that the fibers provide a local path for hot spots perhaps penetrating deep into the preheat zone of the composite.…”
A major
challenge in formulating and manufacturing energetic materials
lies in the balance between total energy density, energy release rate,
and mechanical integrity. In this work, carbon fibers are embedded
into ∼90 wt % loading Al/CuO nanothermite sticks through a
simple extrusion direct writing technique. With only ∼2.5 wt
% carbon fiber addition, the burn rate and heat flux were promoted
>2×. In situ microscopic observation of combustion shows that
the carbon fiber intercept ejected hot agglomerates near the burning
surface and enhanced heat feedback to the unreacted material. This
study outlines how these approaches may enhance the propagation and
reduce the two-phase flow losses.
“…In principle, the addition of carbon fibers might also affect the heat transfer in the composites. − The thermal conductivity of carbon fiber can vary widely from ∼10 to ∼1000 W·m –1 ·K –1 , while the value of carbon fibers used in this study is estimated to be ∼10–20 W·m –1 ·K –1 . , A ∼2.5 wt % addition of the carbon fibers, however, should not appreciably increase the calculated overall thermal conductivity/diffusivity, until a fiber conductivity of at least ∼250 W·m –1 ·K –1 (∼aluminum’s thermal conductivity), as shown in Figure S3 and Table S4. Although the addition of carbon fibers might not increase the overall thermal conductivity of the composites, conductive heat transfer from hot burned/burning particles to the unburnt materials via these fibers might be quite efficient, especially in the case where the carbon fibers themselves create a connective network (Figure d) .…”
Section: Results
and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Although the addition of carbon fibers might not increase the overall thermal conductivity of the composites, conductive heat transfer from hot burned/burning particles to the unburnt materials via these fibers might be quite efficient, especially in the case where the carbon fibers themselves create a connective network (Figure d) . However, while the average conductivity might not be substantially impacted (because of its small mass fraction in the composite), the fact remains that the fibers have a much higher thermal conductivity (>10 W·m –1 ·K –1 ) than the polymer matrix (∼0.2 W·m –1 ·K –1 ) and the surrounding gas (∼0.02 W·m –1 ·K –1 ), ,− which provides 10× higher overall thermal conductivity (see detailed calculations in Figure S4 and Table S5) through the gas/carbon fiber combination route (0.17 W·m –1 ·K –1 , Table S5), compared to those via just gas heat transfer (0.017 W·m –1 ·K –1 , Table S5). It is also reasonable to expect that the fibers provide a local path for hot spots perhaps penetrating deep into the preheat zone of the composite.…”
A major
challenge in formulating and manufacturing energetic materials
lies in the balance between total energy density, energy release rate,
and mechanical integrity. In this work, carbon fibers are embedded
into ∼90 wt % loading Al/CuO nanothermite sticks through a
simple extrusion direct writing technique. With only ∼2.5 wt
% carbon fiber addition, the burn rate and heat flux were promoted
>2×. In situ microscopic observation of combustion shows that
the carbon fiber intercept ejected hot agglomerates near the burning
surface and enhanced heat feedback to the unreacted material. This
study outlines how these approaches may enhance the propagation and
reduce the two-phase flow losses.
“…Addition of RDX into propellants [33] can enhance the energy output of the propellants [34][35][36]. Due to weak adhesion between RDX and the binder, voids and exposure of the RDX surfaces increase the burning surface and controlled combustion performances are obtained [37,38]. Taking full advantage of this characteristic, the burning surface increases further at low temperature, and the low temperature sensitivity coefficient of the propellant may be obtained.…”
Low temperature sensitivity coefficients of gun propellants are of great significance for improving the stability of weapon performances. In this work, RDX-NC-NG-DEGDN propellants (R-MNEGP) were prepared to reduce the temperature sensitivity coefficient of mixed charges. The temperature sensitivity coefficients of R-MNEGP, NC-NG-DEGDN propellants (MNEGP) and their mixed charges were studied by closed vessel tests, scanning electron microscope (SEM), and ballistic firing experiments. The results show that the increased burning surface of R-MNEGP compensates the decrease in the burning rate of the propellant when the initial temperature is decreased compared with MNEGP. The temperature sensitivity coefficient of R-MNEGP is lower than that of MNEGP, and the temperature sensitivity coefficients of the mixed charges (R-MNEGP and MNEGP) are between these two temperature sensitivity coefficients in the range of À 40°C-20°C and 20°C-50°C. Compared with MNEGP, the velocity temperature sensitivity coefficients of the mixed charges with 6 wt % and 10 wt % R-MNEGP decreased by 34.86 % and 70.67 %, and the pressure temperature sensitivity coefficients of these decreased by 42.99 % and 100.90 % with increasing temperature from À 40°C to 15°C. And the velocity temperature sensitivity coefficients had no significant change, and the pressure temperature sensitivity coefficients decreased by 2.58 % and 77.98 % in the range of 15°C-50°C. This study offers an attractive strategy for tuning the temperature sensitivity coefficient by mixing charges of R-MNEGP and MNEGP with different temperature sensitivity coefficients.
“…Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-s-triazine (RDX) is an extremely important explosive component with its high energy density, high detonation velocity, and pressure. Recently, RDX has also been widely used in propellants as a high-energy component [5][6][7][8][9][10]. In order to better understand its decomposition characteristics, many detailed researches on its thermal decomposition products and initial reaction pathways have been carried out since 20th century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure6. Apparent activation energy, ln(A α f(α)) vs. conversion for RDX (Note: the calculation of activation energy does not include the melting process).…”
RDX is an important and commonly used energetic material. The understanding thermal decomposition process of RDX is of great significance for the safety of its production, storage, and use. However, due to the coupling of phase transition and thermal decomposition process, a multi-step kinetic model including melting and decomposition process has not been established so far, which is not helpful to the prediction of its thermal behavior in different conditions. In this paper, Differential Scanning Calorimetry was used to measure the decomposition characteristics of RDX at different heating rates. A four-step consecutive reaction model A!A liq !B!C!D was established to depict the melting and decomposition process. Then quench and reheat experiments were performed to determine the types of each step, where the reaction types are autocatalytic except that the step of B!C is an N-order reaction. The model was used to predict the result of slow cook-off test. It was found that the predicted time of thermal explosion is 0.2 h earlier than the experiment and the onset temperature is 0.6°C smaller than experiment, which verifies the rationality of the kinetic model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.