1999
DOI: 10.1159/000020023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Carbon Dioxide on Respiratory Function during Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy in Prone Position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ventilatory and metabolic effects) have seldom been systematically investigated [11,23,24]. Furthermore, most studies were performed at low CO 2 insufflation pressures of 12 to 16 mm Hg [10], not comparable with actual operative settings (use of pressures above 20-25 mm Hg). Comparison between CO 2 insufflation pressures of 15 and 20 mm Hg showed a statistical but not clinically relevant difference in PaCO 2 [11].…”
Section: Postoperative Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ventilatory and metabolic effects) have seldom been systematically investigated [11,23,24]. Furthermore, most studies were performed at low CO 2 insufflation pressures of 12 to 16 mm Hg [10], not comparable with actual operative settings (use of pressures above 20-25 mm Hg). Comparison between CO 2 insufflation pressures of 15 and 20 mm Hg showed a statistical but not clinically relevant difference in PaCO 2 [11].…”
Section: Postoperative Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, a critical analysis of the literature provides limited evidence to support the use of high insufflation pressures, especially when the disadvantages (hemodynamic, pulmonary, and acid-base metabolic effects) are considered [7,10]. Although high pressures increase stroke volume, cardiac output, and mean arterial pressure [11,12], the principal risks include intraoperative hypercapnia and metabolic acidosis [5,10,11,13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, no deleterious cardiovascular effects have been identified up to an insufflation pressure of 25 mmHg; moreover, the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is reported to increase by a considerably smaller margin, presumably because the retroperitoneal space is a confined space [1,2,5,9,10]. Similarly, other studies have shown that the impact of retroperitoneal insufflation on the ventilatory system is minimal, relative to that of transperitoneal insufflation [22,25,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The characteristic retroperitoneal space development pattern at a low insufflation pressure (≤15 mmHg) in dogs has not been observed in humans and pigs. In addition, previous hemodynamic studies in humans and other species involved evaluations at high insufflation pressures (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) in a variety of positions, including the jackknife position and the lateral position with table flexion [5,8,10,22]. Therefore, it can be inferred that different consequences might be observed in healthy dogs positioned in sternal recumbency with the abdomen unsupported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%