2014
DOI: 10.1111/gwat.12238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Carbon and Microbial Community Priming on the Attenuation of Uranium in a Contaminated Floodplain Aquifer

Abstract: The capacity for subsurface sediments to sequester radionuclide contaminants, such as uranium (U), and retain them after bioremediation efforts are completed is critical to the long-term stewardship of re-mediated sites. In U bioremediation strategies, carbon amendment stimulates bioreduction of U(VI) to U(IV), immobilizing it within the sediments. Sediments enriched in natural organic matter are naturally capable of sequestering significant U, but may serve as sources to the aquifer, contributing to plume per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The close relationship identified between the uranium removal efficiency and the abundance of sulfate-reducing bacterial gene markers supports the conclusion that sulfate reduction can be effective for immobilizing aqueous uranium. This conclusion is consistent with those of former field-scale investigations carried out at multiple uranium-contaminated sites (Cardenas et al, 2008;N'Guessan et al, 2008;Lezama-Pacheco et al, 2015;Mouser et al, 2015). Although aqueous U(VI) was shown to form Ca-UO 2 -CO 3 complexes in the slightly alkaline groundwater used in this study (e.g., Williams et al, 2011), the high uranium-removal efficiency (up to 95%) observed in the amended D08 sediments indicated that the presence of such aqueous ternary complexes had little effect on the uranium bioavailability.…”
Section:  Geochemical Controls Of the Biostimulation Effectssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The close relationship identified between the uranium removal efficiency and the abundance of sulfate-reducing bacterial gene markers supports the conclusion that sulfate reduction can be effective for immobilizing aqueous uranium. This conclusion is consistent with those of former field-scale investigations carried out at multiple uranium-contaminated sites (Cardenas et al, 2008;N'Guessan et al, 2008;Lezama-Pacheco et al, 2015;Mouser et al, 2015). Although aqueous U(VI) was shown to form Ca-UO 2 -CO 3 complexes in the slightly alkaline groundwater used in this study (e.g., Williams et al, 2011), the high uranium-removal efficiency (up to 95%) observed in the amended D08 sediments indicated that the presence of such aqueous ternary complexes had little effect on the uranium bioavailability.…”
Section:  Geochemical Controls Of the Biostimulation Effectssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition to these two studies, Mouser et al . [] found unique microbial characteristics within the NRZs, such as the abundance of iron‐reducing Geobacteraceae communities. Recent modeling studies suggested that NRZs have a significant impact on subsurface carbon flux to the atmosphere as well as to the river [ Arora et al ., a, b].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In surface horizons, seasonal changes in communities were observed at the onset of reducing conditions following snowmelt with the appearance of Firmicutes in Topsoil and Clay layers (Supplementary Figure S7). This could be relevant for U cycling; a column experiment with U-contaminated soil taken from the Rifle, CO, site showed that U(VI) removal only occurred when there was an enrichment of Firmicutes relative to other taxa (Mouser et al, 2015).…”
Section: Microbial Community Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of microorganisms in mediating key biogeochemical processes in soils is well-documented. Particularly in floodplain soils that host TRZs and other organic-rich layers, microorganisms have been shown to produce compounds that control redox states, and determine solubility and mobility of contaminants, including metals such as Fe and U (Davis et al, 2006;Mouser et al, 2015). Previous work has indicated that these microorganisms may be distributed based on the geochemical environment in which they reside and its respective seasonal changes (Hug et al, 2015;Danczak et al, 2016a;Nelson et al, 2019), and also that microbial metabolisms in groundwater-influenced soils are interconnected and interdependent (Wrighton et al, 2014;Anantharaman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Key Microbial Taxa Linked To Geochemical Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%