1972
DOI: 10.4141/cjas72-028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Breed of Sire on the Production of Light and Heavy Market Lambs

Abstract: For personal use only.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of breed-of-ram effects on ewe fertility and prolifi cacy in this study is generally consistent with data from studies comparing dual-purpose or terminal-type ram breeds mated in the autumn (Bradford et al, 1960;Fahmy et al, 1972;Carter and Kirton, 1975;Hohenboken et al, 1976;Freking et al, 2000;Speijers et al, 2010). Ewe fertility and prolifi cacy did not differ among Columbia, Suffolk, and Texel rams in studies reported by Latif and Owen (1979), Leymaster and Smith (1981), Leymaster and Jenkins (1993), and Ali et al (2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of breed-of-ram effects on ewe fertility and prolifi cacy in this study is generally consistent with data from studies comparing dual-purpose or terminal-type ram breeds mated in the autumn (Bradford et al, 1960;Fahmy et al, 1972;Carter and Kirton, 1975;Hohenboken et al, 1976;Freking et al, 2000;Speijers et al, 2010). Ewe fertility and prolifi cacy did not differ among Columbia, Suffolk, and Texel rams in studies reported by Latif and Owen (1979), Leymaster and Smith (1981), Leymaster and Jenkins (1993), and Ali et al (2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This study was conducted, in part, because of concerns regarding poor survival of Suffolk-sired crossbred lambs (Bradford et al, 1960;Fahmy et al, 1972;Carter and Kirton, 1975;Smith, 1977). Few studies have directly compared the terminal sire breeds evaluated herein, and no studies have assessed the relative survival of Composite-sired crossbred lambs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All trials included contained far fewer comparisons than the present trial and ranked the Texel as leanest with the large mature-sized breeds such as the Suffolk and Oxford being leaner when compared on an equal liveweight/carcass weight basis with the smaller mature-sized breeds such as the Southdown and Clun. Fahmy et al (1972) showed that lambs sired by New Zealand Southdowns compared well with Suffolk-sired lambs for leanness, with American-type Southdowns producing lambs that had more fat and less lean than the New Zealand Southdowns. For the loin, the Suffolk cross lambs contained least fat, but most bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that breeds have certain genetic limitations regarding growth and production traits (Brand and Franck, 2000), feedlotters may opt to use crossbred animals and so combine desirable traits from two parental breeds in order to increase their production output. Crossbred lambs are more likely to ensure economic success in a feedlot (Duddy et al, 2016), while it is commonly accepted that crossbreeding can improve lamb production (Cloete et al, 2008(Cloete et al, , 2007Fahmy et al, 1972;Sidwell and Miller, 1962). Malhado et al (2009) believed that crossbreeding could be used to meet speci c market needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%