2022
DOI: 10.1002/jor.25481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of bone morphology and femur preparation method on the primary stability of hip revision stems

Abstract: Aseptic loosening is one of the major reasons for re-revisions of cementless revision stems. Insufficient primary stability is associated with bone characteristics and the surgical process. This study aimed to investigate how femur morphology and preparation methods influence the primary stability of revision stems. The Femur morphology was described by the upper femoral curvature (UFC) and an individualized Dorr type classification based on the ratio between the canal-to-calcar ratio (CCR*) and the cortical i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cortical (1056 ± 62 mgHA/cm 3 ) as well as trabecular BMD (272 ± 49 mgHA/cm 3 ) were similar for both stem design groups (p cortical = 0.893, p trabecular = 0.762, independent t-test). About 70% of the bones were Dorr type C according to the adjusted definition of Konow et al [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cortical (1056 ± 62 mgHA/cm 3 ) as well as trabecular BMD (272 ± 49 mgHA/cm 3 ) were similar for both stem design groups (p cortical = 0.893, p trabecular = 0.762, independent t-test). About 70% of the bones were Dorr type C according to the adjusted definition of Konow et al [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hounsfield units were converted to bone mineral density (BMD) in terms of hydroxyapatite concentrations (Structural Insight 3; University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein [ 18 ], Kiel, Germany). Cortical BMD was determined in a 10 mm-wide ring of the femoral shaft at a distance of 5.8% body height distal to the trochanter minor [ 19 ]. An image processing algorithm was used to automatically detect the minor trochanter (threshold: [400–2000 mgHA/cm 3 ] [ 20 ]; Matlab 2022a; The Mathworks, Natick, MA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone morphology was quantified (Matlab 2020b; The MathWorks) using the Cortical-Canal-Shape (CCS). 27 A higher CCS corresponds to an aged bone morphology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Femur‐specific BMD was determined from a 10 mm³ cubic region of interest (ROI) in the head center (AVIZOLite 9.7.0; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Bone morphology was quantified (Matlab 2020b; The MathWorks) using the Cortical‐Canal‐Shape (CCS) 27 . A higher CCS corresponds to an aged bone morphology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final positions of the stem and the final broach in the femur cavity were compared using superimposed laser-scans to compare the seating behavior of the stems quantified by the angle between the broach and implant axis (seating rotation) and the height difference of stem and broach (seating depth). The final position of the implant (varus / valgus tilt) and the canal-fill-ratio was also determined [ 36 ]. The canal-fill-ratio is the ratio between the stem area and the cavity area in a sagittal section of the implanted femur averaged along the entire stem [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%