2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of blood contamination on the bond strength and biointeractivity of Biodentine used as root-end filling

Abstract: Aim To evaluate the influence of blood contamination on the bond strength and apatite forming ability of Biodentine used as root-end filling material. Methodology Eighty (n = 80) extracted single-rooted, sound human maxillary anterior teeth were prepared and obturated. Then, the roots were resected, retrograde cavities were prepared and Biodentine was inserted as the root-end filling material. Teeth were then randomly divided into 2 equal groups (n = 40) according to th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furcation perforation in molars was the most evaluated area due to the high prevalence of perforation in this region during root canal treatments or post‐space preparation (Arens & Torabinejad, 1996 ). Apical root slices were filled with CSCs as root‐end filling material in two studies to stimulate apicoectomy clinical situations in the blood presentation (Akcay et al, 2016 ; Shalabi et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Furcation perforation in molars was the most evaluated area due to the high prevalence of perforation in this region during root canal treatments or post‐space preparation (Arens & Torabinejad, 1996 ). Apical root slices were filled with CSCs as root‐end filling material in two studies to stimulate apicoectomy clinical situations in the blood presentation (Akcay et al, 2016 ; Shalabi et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the evaluated studies demonstrate sample size calculations clearly. The evaluated dentin slices in each group ranged between five (Ratih & Putri, 2017 ) and forty (Shalabi et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations