2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of blistering on deuterium retention in tungsten irradiated by high flux deuterium 10–100eV plasmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The different ranges of incident plasma flux density do not appear to have a strong effect on hydrogenic retention and both W and Mo targets display very similar retention properties. Since the measured retention levels in the ''as received'' tungsten targets is very low and in agreement with literature values [16][17][18], these results indicate that extrapolating low-flux laboratory results to high flux devices is acceptable for unmodified tungsten.…”
Section: à6supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The different ranges of incident plasma flux density do not appear to have a strong effect on hydrogenic retention and both W and Mo targets display very similar retention properties. Since the measured retention levels in the ''as received'' tungsten targets is very low and in agreement with literature values [16][17][18], these results indicate that extrapolating low-flux laboratory results to high flux devices is acceptable for unmodified tungsten.…”
Section: à6supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The low retention values at the 8 mm position are likely due to partial shadowing of the target from the plasma since this is the location of the edge of the molybdenum clamping ring that is used to clamp the target to the heat sink. This trend of strongly decreasing retention at these temperatures is not unexpected [12][13].…”
Section: Spatial and Depth Distribution Of Dmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The main impurity in the plasma was oxygen with a concentration less than 1 ppm [14]. The impact energy The main parameter that was changed in the experimental series was the sample temperature during plasma exposure, which was varied between 320 and 720 K. The exposure temperature was measured with a thermocouple pressed onto the rear side of the specimen [15]. The temperature was adjusted by varying the thermal contact of the specimen to the target holder in order to change the effective cooling of the plasma-heated specimen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%