2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of biofilm on the transport of fullerene (C60) nanoparticles in porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7b to d). Previous studies have shown that the number of nanoparticles attached to surfaces increases with the presence of biofilm EPS, in a way that cannot be well predicted by the traditional Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory (50)(51)(52). The results of this study suggest that the interactions between bacteria and nanoparticles may be governed largely by the AB (hydrophobic) interaction, which coincides well with the XDLVO theory, in which a hydrophobic interaction energy is added to the DLVO theory.…”
Section: Fig 2 Comparison Of Photocatalytic Inactivation Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…7b to d). Previous studies have shown that the number of nanoparticles attached to surfaces increases with the presence of biofilm EPS, in a way that cannot be well predicted by the traditional Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory (50)(51)(52). The results of this study suggest that the interactions between bacteria and nanoparticles may be governed largely by the AB (hydrophobic) interaction, which coincides well with the XDLVO theory, in which a hydrophobic interaction energy is added to the DLVO theory.…”
Section: Fig 2 Comparison Of Photocatalytic Inactivation Efficienciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1, and hence a higher nanoparticle deposition rate. Lower breakthrough curves were also observed by Tong et al (2010) with fullerene (C 60 ) nanoparticle transport in sand columns with an E. coli biofilm, by Tripathi et al (2012) with sulphonated polystyrene latex bead transport in sand columns, to which a P. aeruginosa biofilm was introduced, by Li et al (2013) with several nanoparticles in biofilm coated sand filters, as well as by Jiang et al (2013) in ZnO nanoparticle transport in sand columns with an E. coli biofilm. All nanoparticles were negatively charged.…”
Section: Influence Of Biofilms On Nanoparticle Transportmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Zerovalent iron nanoparticles capped with polyacrylic acid were used in the transport experiments, and NaCl electrolyte ionic strength was 1 mM. A higher retention rate of nanoparticles was observed in higher ionic strength electrolyte of 25 mM, an effect also demonstrated by Tong et al (2010). This was explained by lower compression of the electrical double layer (EDL) of nanoparticles at low ionic strength, resulting in increased electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged polymer-coated nZVI and the negatively charged biofilm (Lerner et al, 2012).…”
Section: Influence Of Biofilms On Nanoparticle Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations