2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of ballast models in the dynamic response of railway viaducts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
32
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, between 10 and 10.5 s the number of periods was 7.5 which gives a lower eigenfrequency of 15 Hz. Obviously the system stiffness decreases with higher amplitudes-a behaviour which was also observed in [4] and which can be explained by a Fig. 8.…”
Section: Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, between 10 and 10.5 s the number of periods was 7.5 which gives a lower eigenfrequency of 15 Hz. Obviously the system stiffness decreases with higher amplitudes-a behaviour which was also observed in [4] and which can be explained by a Fig. 8.…”
Section: Test Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The investigations have been performed against the background that recent publications have discussed the important role played by the ballast in terms of stiffness/damping contribution and coupling effects [3,4]. Within their publications the authors compare results from field measurements with results from numerical analysis and come to the conclusion that nonlinear behaviour of the ballast with regard to stiffness and damping should be taken into consideration within dynamic analysis of ballasted railway bridges.…”
Section: Introduction and General Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The influence of the track and the ballast, which can also affect the dynamic behaviour of the bridge [28][29][30][31][32], has been taken into account only by means of the associated dead masses. A detailed vehicle idealisation, that would cause a reduction in the vibration levels of the bridge [33,34] at resonance and of the ground [35], is also disregarded, and a moving load model has been used during the investigation.…”
Section: Approach Of the Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The influence of the track and the ballast, which can also affect the dynamic behaviour of the bridge [28][29][30][31][32], has been taken into account only by means of its associated dead mass. A detailed vehicle idealisation, that would cause a reduction in the vibration levels of the bridge [33,34] and the ground [35], is also disregarded, and a moving load model has been used during the investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%