2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of bainite reaction on the kinetics of carbon redistribution during the Quenching and Partitioning process

Abstract: In the present study the microstructural evolution and kinetics of carbon redistribution during the partitioning step of the Quenching and Partitioning process are investigated by means of a modeling approach that simultaneously considers the martensite-austenite carbon partitioning and the decomposition of austenite into bainitic ferrite. The development of the phase fractions, interface position, and carbon compositions are analyzed for two different binary Fe-C alloys with distinct initial carbon compositio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As the partitioning mechanism is fast, the Pt parameter has in practice little effect except if other physical mechanisms take place. The so-called partitioning process can in fact be hindered by a possible carbide free bainitic transformation in retained austenite [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ], by carbon segregations on martensite defects [ 7 ], and also by carbide precipitation in martensite [ 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. These two last processes also occur commonly when tempering as-quenched martensitic steels [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the partitioning mechanism is fast, the Pt parameter has in practice little effect except if other physical mechanisms take place. The so-called partitioning process can in fact be hindered by a possible carbide free bainitic transformation in retained austenite [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ], by carbon segregations on martensite defects [ 7 ], and also by carbide precipitation in martensite [ 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. These two last processes also occur commonly when tempering as-quenched martensitic steels [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Nishikawa et al [32] demonstrated that the kinetics of carbon partitioning from martensite to austenite is controlled by carbon diffusion in martensite and little affected by the simultaneous occurrence of bainite reaction by simulation. Therefore, the CCET model assumes that carbon partitioning from martensite to austenite is completed before the austenite starts to decompose.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, this velocity is critical for the determination of the area of retained austenite around tempered martensite plates, especially for low-carbon steels, in order to design the structural and mechanical properties of the material, since three different phenomena could occur during the partitioning stage: (i) The amount of austenite's carbon enrichment to stabilize it after the final quench; (ii) Nucleation and growth of third phases (e.g., bainitic ferrite); and (iii) Carbide precipitation. Nishikawa et al [27] modeled the influence of the bainite reaction on the kinetics of carbon redistribution during the Q&P process. Simulations indicate that the kinetics of carbon partitioning from martensite to austenite is controlled by carbon diffusion in austenite and is affected only to a small extent by the decomposition of austenite into bainitic ferrite.…”
Section: Carbon Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%