2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of bacterial adhesion on copper extraction from printed circuit boards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, films were detected on some other fragments ( Figure 12D), but it was not possible to determine whether they were derived from the microbial activity or from lyophilisation of the 26 ionic solution. These observations did not enable us to confirm that bacteria became preferentially attached to certain fragments, as asserted by Silva et al (2015). Ta, W and Ga, the analytical uncertainties were still higher than the maximum concentration that would be reached if they were completely dissolved.…”
Section: Estimated Fe Dissolution Yieldmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, films were detected on some other fragments ( Figure 12D), but it was not possible to determine whether they were derived from the microbial activity or from lyophilisation of the 26 ionic solution. These observations did not enable us to confirm that bacteria became preferentially attached to certain fragments, as asserted by Silva et al (2015). Ta, W and Ga, the analytical uncertainties were still higher than the maximum concentration that would be reached if they were completely dissolved.…”
Section: Estimated Fe Dissolution Yieldmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Most of the studies also show that staggering the biological production of a lixiviant acidic solution containing Fe(III) and the addition of PCBs increases bioleaching efficiency, probably by lowering the toxicity of PCBs for microbial growth (Liang et al, 2013, Brandl et al, 2001). Figure 1 shows Cu dissolution kinetics determined in studies addressing PCB bioleaching (Adhapure et al, 2013;Arshadi and Mousavi, 2014;Arshadi and Mousavi, 2015;Bai et al, 2009;Bai et al, 2016;Bas et al, 2013;Brandl et al, 1999;Bryan et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2015;Choi et al, 2004;Gu et al, 2014;Gu et al, 2017a;Gu et al, 2017b;Guezennec et al, 2015;Ilyas et al, 2007;Ilyas et al, 2010;Ilyas et al, 2013;Ilyas et Lee, 2014;Işildar et al, 2015;Liang et al, 2010;Liang et al, 2013;Liang et al, 2016;Mäkinen et al, 2015;Mrážiková et al, 2013;Mrážiková et al, 2015;Mrážiková et al, 2016;Nie et al, 2014;Nie et al, 2015;Priya and Hait, 2018;Rodrigues et al, 2015;Shah et al, 2014;Shah et al, 2015;Silva et al, 2015;Sodha et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2018;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the indirect contact mechanism is regarded as the mechanism of bioleaching of PCBs (Silva et al 2015). In addition, the mechanism of bioleaching of copper from PCBs is present as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxidizing metal sulfides to sulfate via contact between bacteria and mineral (direct) and oxidizing Fe 2+ to Fe 3+ or/and S o to SO 4 (without contact: indirect) are the main mechanisms of metal extraction in the bioleaching process [53][54][55][56][57][58][59]. Moreover, it was well understood that oxidation of Fe 2+ to Fe 3+ during bioprocess decreases pH values and Fe T in the solution (precipitation of iron as jarosite and other iron oxides/hydroxides: Equations (2)-(4)) [60][61][62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%