1985
DOI: 10.1093/ee/14.5.568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Bacteria Within Bovine Feces on the Development of the Face Fly (Diptera: Muscidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased growth rate in C. vomitoria found here on the mixed diet compared with the other diets, is consistent with previous studies where multi-species bacterial communities have been found to be favourable to larval development for the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria [27], as well as flies of the Muscidae family [46][47][48][49][50]. The blow flies may gain direct nutritional benefits through the ingestion of microbes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The increased growth rate in C. vomitoria found here on the mixed diet compared with the other diets, is consistent with previous studies where multi-species bacterial communities have been found to be favourable to larval development for the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria [27], as well as flies of the Muscidae family [46][47][48][49][50]. The blow flies may gain direct nutritional benefits through the ingestion of microbes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some aerobic bacteria have been shown to be sufÞ-cient for house ßy (Beard and Sands 1973, Schmidtmann and Martin 1992, Watson et al 1993, Zurek et al 2000, and for stable ßy, Stomoxys calcitrans (L) (Lysyk et al 1999). Hollis et al (1985) found that steam sterilization and antibiotics reduced nutritional value of bovine dung for face ßy, Musca autumnalis DeGeer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two studies suggest that microbial symbionts may not be necessary and, in some cases, are detrimental for normal larval development. In contrast, many other studies have shown that if maggots are rendered axenic because of treatment with antibiotics, growth and maintenance in sterile conditions, or feeding on sterilized food, they display altered immunological responses, increased pupariation time, and decreased mass of pupae (Fitt and OÕBrien 1985, Hollis et al 1985, Schmidtmann and Martin 1992, Sherman et al 1995, Lysyk et al 1999, Zurek et al 2000, Perotti et al 2001, Dillon and Dillon 2004, Romero et al 2006, Freitak et al 2007. To complicate matters further, there is also evidence that some antibacterial compounds (including sarcotoxins, produced by certain sarcophagids) may play a dual role in which they both limit microbial growth (in diversity, concentration, or both) and allow for proper larval development Natori 1988, Matova andAnderson 2006), most likely through skewing the larval microbiota toward a more favorable population.…”
Section: The Roles Of Microorganisms and Microbial Products In The Sumentioning
confidence: 99%