2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of automation on mind wandering frequency in sustained attention

Abstract: Recent evidences showing that mind wandering might fill the time saved by automation are particularly worrying when taking into account the negative effect of mind wandering on short-term performance. 17 participants performed an obstacle avoidance task under manual and automated conditions in 2 sessions lasting 45 minutes each. We recorded attentional probes, oculometry and answers to the Task Load Index after each session. Subjects perceived the manual condition as more demanding than the automated one. We h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that the answers to these questions will always depend on the exact characteristics of the main task and of the MW episodes. In this sense, we agree with Konishi et al (32; see also 31,45), suggesting that the content of MW and the context in which it emerges are determinant for its relation to other neurocognitive variables (including pupil size). Therefore, it is impossible, a priori, to predict the direction of pupil modulations for a new experimental setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe that the answers to these questions will always depend on the exact characteristics of the main task and of the MW episodes. In this sense, we agree with Konishi et al (32; see also 31,45), suggesting that the content of MW and the context in which it emerges are determinant for its relation to other neurocognitive variables (including pupil size). Therefore, it is impossible, a priori, to predict the direction of pupil modulations for a new experimental setting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, other studies have reported the opposite finding: reduced pupil dilation during MW [e.g. 27,[31][32][33]. The control of pupil diameter is affected by a variety of factors [e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mind wandering is more prevalent and interferes less with task performance in low as compared to high demand tasks Rummel & Boywitt, 2014). Mind wandering is also more prevalent in practiced versus non-practiced tasks (Cunningham et al, 2000;Giambra, 1995) in automated environments (Gouraud et al, 2018), that is situations in which less attentional control is needed, and when probed less frequently (Schubert et al, 2019a;Seli et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…associated with sudden noise or a bright stimulus, also elicits pupillary dilatation [55][56][57][58] . Conversely, smaller pupil sizes are seen with mind-wandering and introspection, and decreasing pupillary diameters reflect distraction and poor task performance [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] . Pupillary changes can thus uncover the level of attention and the amount of mental effort with high temporal resolution [68][69][70][71] .…”
Section: Pupillary Dilatation: Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%