2020
DOI: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of autoclave sterilization procedures on the cyclic fatigue resistance of heat-treated nickel-titanium instruments: a systematic review

Abstract: Objectives: This systematic review evaluated the influence of autoclave sterilization procedures on the cyclic fatigue resistance of heat-treated nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments. Results: From 203 abstracts, a total of 10 articles matched the eligible criteria. After reading the full articles, 2 were excluded because of the absence of the heat-treated instruments in the experimental design and 3 due to the lack of a control group using heat-treated instruments without autoclave sterilization. From the 5 inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological quality of the included research was determined using an adaption of a prior systematic review that included in vitro investigations. [ 13 ] The domains listed below were used: (1) sample standardization, (2) sample size calculation, (3) sample randomization, (4) single-operator, (5) blinding, (6) testing model standardization, and (7) appropriate statistical analysis. The domains were categorized as “+” to specify a low risk of bias (RoB) and “-” to indicate a high RoB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological quality of the included research was determined using an adaption of a prior systematic review that included in vitro investigations. [ 13 ] The domains listed below were used: (1) sample standardization, (2) sample size calculation, (3) sample randomization, (4) single-operator, (5) blinding, (6) testing model standardization, and (7) appropriate statistical analysis. The domains were categorized as “+” to specify a low risk of bias (RoB) and “-” to indicate a high RoB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to standardize experimental parameters, files were tested in a canal grooved within a metal block without any back-and-forth movement. Although this static model does not reproduce clinical situations, nor does it replicate the extended distribution of stresses associated with rhythmic movement, it remains the preferred model for evaluating cyclic fatigue used in previous studies [8,9,13,14]. That said, the results obtained in this study may not be identically reproducible in clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Because thermal treatment has a significant influence on the mechanical properties of NiTi, the additional heat that files are subjected to during autoclaving procedures may have an effect on the mechanical qualities of these instruments. A recent systematic review [9] reported that the cyclic fatigue resistance of heat-treated NiTi instruments seems to be influenced by autoclave sterilization methods. According to Zhao et al [6], although thermal-treated HyFlex CM, Twisted File, and K3XF instruments were found to be more resistant to cyclic fatigue failure than Race and K3 instruments, autoclaved HyFlex CM and K3XF instruments were more resistant to cyclic fatigue than Twisted File.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is excessive diversity in the studies, such as different apparatuses to measure cyclic fatigue, different angles of curvature of the artificial canals with which the cyclic fatigue was measured, the heterogeneity of instruments and different numbers of sterilization cycles. These differences can lead to results with a high heterogeneity index, as also indicated by a recent systematic review conducted by Silva et al [87].…”
Section: Cyclic Fatiguementioning
confidence: 84%
“…First outcome: Khabiri et The entire selection and screening procedure, as described in Table 2 (Ref. [7,40,41,[87][88][89][90]), is presented in the flowchart in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%