Influence of arm position on catheter placement during real-time ultrasound-guided right infraclavicular proximal axillary venous catheterization † †This Article is accompanied by Editorial Aev445.
“…In catheterization of the right subclavian vein, subjects were placed in 10 Trendelenburg position, with their upper limbs abducted to prevent misplacement of the catheter. 15 The skin insertion point was on the inferior side of the right clavicle and lateral to its midpoint, while an optimal ultrasonographic image of the straight portion of the subclavian or proximal axillary vein was maintained on the longitudinal axis view.…”
“…In catheterization of the right subclavian vein, subjects were placed in 10 Trendelenburg position, with their upper limbs abducted to prevent misplacement of the catheter. 15 The skin insertion point was on the inferior side of the right clavicle and lateral to its midpoint, while an optimal ultrasonographic image of the straight portion of the subclavian or proximal axillary vein was maintained on the longitudinal axis view.…”
“…Glen et al [29] in a group of 119 mechanically ventilated patients conducted cannula tions using the shortaxis technique with an effectiveness of 94% and with a low rate of complications. Ahn et al [30] performed a randomized clinical trial of mechanically ven tilated patients and compared the influence of abduction of the arm on the efficacy of catheterization of the axillary vein. A survey that preceded the samplesize calculation demonstrated an efficacy of 97.1% versus 98.8%, and did not show differences in the rates of complications.…”
Section: Real-time Ultrasound Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey that preceded the samplesize calculation demonstrated an efficacy of 97.1% versus 98.8%, and did not show differences in the rates of complications. In the subgroup of patients cannulated with abduction of the arm there was a considerably smaller rate of improper place ment of the tip of the catheter [30]. Buzancais et al [31] used the longaxis technique for infraclavicular access and compared the cannulation of the axillary vein in proximal and distal parts of the vein.…”
Section: Real-time Ultrasound Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, abduction of the arm and catheterization of the axillary vein in its proximal segment reduces the rate of this complica tion [30,31]. It should be noted that intravenous location of the tip of the catheter outside the superior vena cava is not a dangerous complication.…”
Central vein cannulation is one of the most commonly performed procedures in intensive care. Traditio nally, the jugular and subclavian vein are recommended as the first choice option. Nevertheless, these attempts are not always obtainable for critically ill patients. For this reason, the axillary vein seems to be a rational alternative approach. In this narrative review, we evaluate the usefulness of the infraclavicular access to the axillary vein. The existing evidence suggests that infraclavicular approach to the axillary vein is a reliable method of central vein catheterization, especially when performed with ultrasound guidance.
“…The implementation of preventive measures to control healthcarerelated infections aims to provide a safer care to patients. This theme has been discussed all over the world, showing several strategies that can be adopted to guarantee quality in health care (6,8,9) . For this reason, this study aims to evaluate the compliance of the care process, involving the insertion of CVC for hemodialysis.…”
Objective:To evaluate the compliance of the care process involving insertion of central vascular catheter (CVC) in hemodialysis. Method: Cross-sectional quantitative approach developed at the hemodialysis service of a reference hospital in Sergipe, Brazil. Sample consisting of 1,342 actions evaluated, corresponding to 122 forms for monitoring and control of CVC insertion. Data collection was held from July to December 2016. Results: The adherence rate to the use of the insertion form was 54.9%. The procedure evaluated achieved 93% overall compliance. Of the 11 specific actions observed, seven (64%) presented 100% compliance. The density of the overall incidence of primary bloodstream infections reduced from 10.6 to 3.1 infections per 1,000 patients/day. Conclusion: Although the observed actions reached specific desired conformities, the use of the checklist was lower than expected. Strategies for monitoring, coaching and educational and organizational actions can contribute to safe care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.