2000
DOI: 10.1006/jare.2000.0644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on biomass production, nutrient uptake and physiological changes in Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. under water stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in total chlorophyll content in inoculated plants may be due to increased uptake of phosphorus, which will increase the photosynthetic activity of Catharanthus roseus plants and ultimately the chlorophyll content. The present results are in agreement with several authors who found increased chlorophyll content in mycorrhizal inoculated plants as compared to non inoculated plants (Allen et al, 1981;Morte et al, 2000;Mathur and Vyas, 2000). The mutuality of symbiotic fungi stimulated the production of more leaf chlorophyll that consequently may lead to an increase in photosynthetic potential of inoculated plants and hence enhanced growth (Ekanayake et al, 2004).…”
Section: Physiological and Biochemical Parameterssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The increase in total chlorophyll content in inoculated plants may be due to increased uptake of phosphorus, which will increase the photosynthetic activity of Catharanthus roseus plants and ultimately the chlorophyll content. The present results are in agreement with several authors who found increased chlorophyll content in mycorrhizal inoculated plants as compared to non inoculated plants (Allen et al, 1981;Morte et al, 2000;Mathur and Vyas, 2000). The mutuality of symbiotic fungi stimulated the production of more leaf chlorophyll that consequently may lead to an increase in photosynthetic potential of inoculated plants and hence enhanced growth (Ekanayake et al, 2004).…”
Section: Physiological and Biochemical Parameterssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are in agreement with those previously found by Sánchez-Blanco et al (2004) and Morte et al (2001) who detected higher chlorophyll concentrations in mycorrhizal plants subjected to drought stress. In addition, Mathur and Vyas (2000) concluded that arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization increased chlorophyll synthesis, which could be associated with higher photosynthesis rates and plant growth. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that rewatered inoculated plants maintained the leaf chlorophyll concentration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root colonization with mycorrhizal fungi generally has positive effects on plant growth (Chalk et al, 2006) and mycorrhizal inoculation is frequently applied to increase crop plant productivity in agricultural systems (li et al, 2000oRtaS et al, 2003;oRtaS, 2010). Positive effects of mycorrhiza on plants include increases in height (hayman, 1986;hoekSema et al, 2010;SafapouR et al, 2011), biomass (VejSadoVa et al, 1993;mathuR and VyaS, 2000;Ramana et al, 2010), shoot:root ratio (gaVito et al, 2000;VeReSoglou et al, 2012), production of flowers (dodd et al, 1983;CaRey et al, 1992), and yield in crop plants such as Phaseolus vulgaris, Glycine max, and Triticum aestivum (VejSadoVa et al, 1993;BethlenfalVay et al, 1997;aBdel-fattah, 1997;li et al, 2005;Ramana et al, 2010;SafapouR et al, 2011). There is an extensive body of literature on the effects of mycorrhizal fungi in a broad range of plant families including legumes (BaRea and azConaguilaR, 1983;yang et al, 1994;olSen et al, 1999a;1999b;liu et al, 2003;SCheuBlin and Ridgway, 2004;oRtaS, 2008;muleta, 2010) but a detailed understanding of costs and benefits arising from the mycorrhizal symbiosis under different abiotic conditions is often lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%