Influence of anthropogenic nutrient inputs on rates of coastal ocean nitrogen and carbon cycling in the Southern California Bight, United States

Abstract

Coastal nitrogen enrichment is a global environmental problem that can influence acidification, deoxygenation, and subsequent habitat loss in ways that can be synergistic with global climate change impacts. In the Southern California Bight, an eastern boundary upwelling system, modeling of wastewater discharged through ocean outfalls has shown that it effectively doubles nitrogen loading to urban coastal waters. However, effects of wastewater outfalls on rates of primary production and respiration, key processes through which coastal acidification and deoxygenation are manifested, have not been directly linked to observed trends in ambient chlorophyll a, oxygen, or pH. Here, we follow a “reference-area” approach and compare nutrient concentrations and rates of nitrification, primary production, and respiration observed in areas within treated wastewater effluent plumes to areas spatially distant from ocean outfalls where we expected minimal plume influence. We document that wastewater nutrient inputs had an immediate, local effect on nutrient stoichiometry, elevating ammonium and nitrite concentrations by 4 µM and 0.2 µM (on average), respectively, and increasing dissolved nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratios 7-fold within the plume. Chlorophyll a increased slightly by 1 µg L–1 in the upper 60 m of the water column (on average), and δ13C and δ15 N of suspended particulate matter, an integrated measure of primary production, increased by 1.3% and 1%, respectively (on average). Nitrification rates within the plume increased by 17 nmol L–1 day–1 (on average). We did not observe a significant near-plume effect on δ18O and δ15 N of dissolved nitrate + nitrite, an indicator of nitrogen assimilation into biomass, on rates of primary production and respiration or on dissolved oxygen concentration, suggesting that any potential impact from wastewater on these key features is moderated by other factors, notably water mass mixing. These results indicate that a “reference-area” approach may be insufficient to document regional-scale impacts of nutrients.