1992
DOI: 10.1128/aac.36.3.616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of angiotensin II-induced alterations in renal flow on excretion of cefonicid in isolated perfused rat kidneys

Abstract: The effects of variations in renal perfusate flow on the excretion of cefonicid was examined in isolated perfused rat kidneys. Cefonicid, an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, is primarily eliminated by active tubular secretion and is neither metabolized nor reabsorbed in the isolated kidney. We used angiotensin II (All), a strong vasoconstrictor hormone of the afferent and the efferent arterioles in the kidney, to determine whether the renal and secretion clearances, as well as the excretion ratio (ER = CLR/I[I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure changes are an unlikely mechanism for the reduction in chlorothiazide secretion since only a modest increase in pressure is observed in this treatment group (chlorothiazide + AI1). Similar reductions in secretory clearance were also observed for furosemide and cefonicid in rat IPK experiments in which AII caused dramatic hemodynamic changes but pressure was unchanged (5,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Pressure changes are an unlikely mechanism for the reduction in chlorothiazide secretion since only a modest increase in pressure is observed in this treatment group (chlorothiazide + AI1). Similar reductions in secretory clearance were also observed for furosemide and cefonicid in rat IPK experiments in which AII caused dramatic hemodynamic changes but pressure was unchanged (5,24).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…There were no significant differences in IPK function when comparing quinapril vs. quinaprilat administration with one exception; GFR differed by about 20% in these studies. Overall, physiologic parameters were within the normal range of values for this technique (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28), and were stable for the duration of each experiment.…”
Section: Physiologic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…FE~oa~m and urine flow rate were significantly greater when quinaprilat was coperfused with high dose p-aminohippurate (10,000• This finding is similar to that described earlier for quinapril • p-aminohippurate and probably reflects an osmotic diuretic effect. Physiologic parameters were within the normal range of values for this technique (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), and were stable for the duration of each experiment.…”
Section: Physiologic Functionmentioning
confidence: 67%