Influence of algorithmic management practices on workplace well-being – evidence from European organisations

Abstract

PurposeExisting literature on algorithmic management practices – defined as autonomous data-driven decision making in people's management by adoption of self-learning algorithms and artificial intelligence – suggests complex relationships with employees' well-being in the workplace. While the use of algorithms can have positive impacts on people-related decisions, they may also adversely influence job autonomy, perceived justice and – as a result – workplace well-being. Literature review revealed a significant gap in empirical research on the nature and direction of these relationships. Therefore the purpose of this paper is to analyse how algorithmic management practices directly influence workplace well-being, as well as investigating its relationships with job autonomy and total rewards practices.Design/methodology/approachConceptual model of relationships between algorithmic management practices, job autonomy, total rewards and workplace well-being has been formulated on the basis of literature review. Proposed model has been empirically verified through confirmatory analysis by means of structural equation modelling (SEM CFA) on a sample of 21,869 European organisations, using data collected by Eurofound and Cedefop in 2019, with the focus of investigating the direct and indirect influence of algorithmic management practices on workplace well-being.FindingsThis research confirmed a moderate, direct impact of application of algorithmic management practices on workplace well-being. More importantly the authors found out that this approach has an indirect influence, through negative impact on job autonomy and total rewards practices. The authors observed significant variation in the level of influence depending on the size of the organisation, with the decreasing impacts of algorithmic management on well-being and job autonomy for larger entities.Originality/valueWhile the influence of algorithmic management on various workplace practices and effects is now widely discussed, the empirical evidence – especially for traditional work contexts, not only gig economy – is highly limited. The study fills this gap and suggests that algorithmic management – understood as an automated decision-making vehicle – might not always lead to better, well-being focused, people management in organisations. Academic studies and practical applications need to account for possible negative consequences of algorithmic management for the workplace well-being, by better reflecting complex nature of relationships between these variables.

The impact of digitalization on employees' future competencies: has human resource development a conditional role here?

“…Decius et al (2019) presented that if the machine is wrongly working, an employee usually tries to find a solution using a trial and error strategy or asks more experienced coworkers for advice. Finally, technological advancements in HRM can provide employees with information related to the level of their competencies and necessary changes (Kinowska and Sienkiewicz, 2022). The above allows for the formulation of the following hypothesis.…”

How can facilities management benefit from offices becoming more user-centred?

“…High-quality FM is up-to-date and uses these new technologies to improve office buildings to best serve occupants’ needs. Their actions can help, even in a minor way, to reduce friction in the workplace, save time and make work life more convenient and efficient for the employees (Fairchild, 2019; Kinowska and Sienkiewicz, 2022; Remes et al , 2022; Ruohomäki et al , 2015; Tuzcuoğlu et al , 2022; Vigren et al , 2022). It has been noted that employees’ satisfaction with the workplace affects their productivity (Groen et al , 2019; Nguyen et al , 2022), which in turn influences the company’s financial success (Nguyen et al , 2022).…”

“…Failing to implement these new ways of working might cause dissatisfaction among the occupants (Marzban, et al , 2022). The new trends are making intelligent and data-driven management practices central in FM (Kinowska and Sienkiewicz, 2022).…”

“…FM’s mission is to create a work environment that promotes occupant well-being and productivity (IFMA, 2022; Kinowska and Sienkiewicz, 2022; van Sprang and Drion, 2020). To meet the needs of today, FM must consider digitalization, IoT, smart technologies, smartphone or desktop applications and their development (Bröchner et al , 2019; Cooper et al , 2017; Fairchild, 2019; Gocer et al , 2022; Kinowska and Sienkiewicz, 2022; Marson and McAllister, 2021; Nota et al , 2021; Sarkar, 2021; Tuzcuoğlu et al , 2022; Vigren et al , 2022).…”

Work engagement of online car-hailing drivers: the effects of platforms' algorithmic management

“…As algorithmic management changes drivers' employment relationships and work conditions (Waldkirch et al, 2021), it has a marked influence on drivers' work-related state (Wood, 2021). Several previous studies have explored how algorithmic management may affect workers (Kinowska and Sienkiewicz, 2020). For example, from the work design perspective, Parent-Rocheleau and Parker (2022) have argued that algorithmic management affects employees' motivation and well-being by affecting their job demands (e.g.…”