2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Aggregate Gradation on the Performance Properties of Porous Asphalt Mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with previous studies that observed higher infiltration capacities in clogged PC mixtures [9] and higher infiltration capacity reductions in PA mixtures [20]. The higher infiltration capacity of PC mixtures compared to PA mixtures, together with the different void structure of the two materials caused by the different mixture designs, could be the cause of the higher infiltration capacities and lower clogging rates observed in PC mixtures, as reported by previous works [42,43]. Grouping the results obtained depending on the material used and sediment load, it can be observed that the tested PC mixtures performed better in terms of infiltration capacity than the PA ones for all the air void contents (Figure 4a) and clogging scenarios (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in agreement with previous studies that observed higher infiltration capacities in clogged PC mixtures [9] and higher infiltration capacity reductions in PA mixtures [20]. The higher infiltration capacity of PC mixtures compared to PA mixtures, together with the different void structure of the two materials caused by the different mixture designs, could be the cause of the higher infiltration capacities and lower clogging rates observed in PC mixtures, as reported by previous works [42,43]. Grouping the results obtained depending on the material used and sediment load, it can be observed that the tested PC mixtures performed better in terms of infiltration capacity than the PA ones for all the air void contents (Figure 4a) and clogging scenarios (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The deposition of 500 g/m 2 of sediments proved to be enough to reduce the infiltration capacity to the range of 63%-79% for PA mixtures and 57%-86% in PC mixtures on average, depending on the air void content. The infiltration capacity is normally higher in PC mixtures than in PA mixtures for the scenarios tested, probably due to the different gradations used for the two materials, which leads to different pore properties, and may result in different infiltration capacities and clogging dynamics for similar air void contents, according to previous studies [41][42][43].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Aggregate gradation has a great impact on the structural and functional performance of porous asphalt mixture required for a specific application [22,23]. In order to investigate the effect of the nominal maximum aggregate sizes and aggregate gradations on air void properties for porous asphalt concrete, five kinds of commonly-used porous asphalt concretes (PAC-5, PAC-10, PAC-13(1), PAC-13(2), and PAC-13(3)) were designed by the gyratory compaction method.…”
Section: Materials and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.6 (± 2.3) 15.4 (± 2.0) 44.8 (± 8.4) G8 4.8 (± 1.2) 7.5 (± 0.4) 20.1 (± 0.5) PAM's permeability performance increased with both kinds of air voids contents, namely TAV and WAAV contents ( Figures 4.12 and 4.13). There was no obvious trend that WAAV content showed stronger correlation with permeability than TAV content as stated by some research (Mansour and Putman 2013), which was probably due to WAAV content being approximately linearly related with TAV content (Figure 4.9). According to ASTM (2008), coefficient of permeability, k, greater than 116 (×10 -3 cm/s) is recommended for PAMs.…”
Section: Permeability Testmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Among the factors to aggregate packing, aggregate gradation is the most unstructured one, namely it is a relatively independent factor and can be readily modified, and hence it deserves more attention (Roque et al 1997;Ruth et al 2002;Vavrik et al 2002;Suresha et al 2009;Alvarez et al 2010a;Mansour and Putman. 2013).…”
Section: Aggregate Gradation and Packing Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%