2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2008.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of age and movement complexity on kinematic hand movement parameters in childhood and adolescence

Abstract: Development of fine motor functions, especially drawing and handwriting, are crucial for performance in school, autonomy in everyday life and the general human development. A variety of neurological and psychiatric conditions in childhood and adolescence stunt the normal development of fine motor skills. We sought to define the normal development of the kinematic parameters of fine motor movement and determine the influence of gender, laterality of handedness and extracurricular training on fine motor skills. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
63
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to the speculation that the categorical action sequences used in the current study may have different preparation loads. And the different preparations may be due to movement complexity of sequences [39], [40]. However, in this study, the overall error rates among the three categories did not show statistical difference, and the movement onset latency among the three categories did not differ significantly either.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…This leads to the speculation that the categorical action sequences used in the current study may have different preparation loads. And the different preparations may be due to movement complexity of sequences [39], [40]. However, in this study, the overall error rates among the three categories did not show statistical difference, and the movement onset latency among the three categories did not differ significantly either.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Dorfberger et al [26] reported that girls were significantly faster at writing nonsense words in early blocks of trials (n = 116, 9–17 years age range) but this effect disappeared in later blocks before a male advantage appeared in the final blocks for the oldest age group only (17 years). Rueckreigel et al [32] reported that males were faster in a drawing task (producing a circle) but not on a sentence or repetitive letter writing task (n = 187, 6–18 years old), though the study did not stratify the sample for age. Van Mier [33] found no sex differences in a task that required children to move a handheld stylus around small and large targets on a screen (n = 60, 4–12 years age range).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We examined trends from a variety of areas representing distinct functional domains and developmental characteristics. The hippocampus and precuneus represent higher-order memory and cognitive functions [53], and the occipital cortex and precentral gyrus represent sensorimotor regions that are presumed to mature relatively early in development [54, 55]. The default mode network (DMN), a collection of regions that are most active when subjects are not specifically engaged in any externally directed task [56], continues to undergo maturation during adolescence [57, 58].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%