2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of age and gender on microarchitecture and bone remodeling in subchondral bone of the osteoarthritic femoral head

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(73 reference statements)
5
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the sections were polished to 20 to 30 μm with the abrasive paper and conducted with Goldner trichrome staining to distinguish between the mineralized bone and osteoid bone . The subchondral bone remodeling parameters were measured by Bioquant Osteo Imaging Toolkit Plug‐in (Bioquant, Nashville, TN, USA): the osteoid thickness (O.Th, μm), osteoid surface percentage (OS/BS, %), eroded surface percentage (ES/BS, %), and ratio of osteoid surface to eroded surface (OS/ES) . Five sequential sections in each specimen were stained, and five areas in each section were evaluated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the sections were polished to 20 to 30 μm with the abrasive paper and conducted with Goldner trichrome staining to distinguish between the mineralized bone and osteoid bone . The subchondral bone remodeling parameters were measured by Bioquant Osteo Imaging Toolkit Plug‐in (Bioquant, Nashville, TN, USA): the osteoid thickness (O.Th, μm), osteoid surface percentage (OS/BS, %), eroded surface percentage (ES/BS, %), and ratio of osteoid surface to eroded surface (OS/ES) . Five sequential sections in each specimen were stained, and five areas in each section were evaluated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sites were chosen specifically to represent regions subjected to different amounts of in vivo loading. Li, et al 25 explored subchondral bone changes with respect to the depth of bone relative to the loading surface, showing a distinct difference in micro architecture and bone remodelling between the deeper and more superior regions of subchondral bone. However, both studies were restricted to excised cores of trabecular bone at discrete locations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 After fixation, all tissue blocks were examined using a micro-CT scanner (Skyscan 1174, Bruker, Kontich, Belgium) according to previous publication. 24 25 The following parameters were calculated: bone volume fraction (BV/TV, %), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, μm), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp, μm), trabecular number (Tb.N, 1/mm), structure model index (SMI), degree of anisotropy (DA) and connectively density (Conn.Dn, 1/mm 3 ). Bone mineralised density (BMD, mg/cm 3 ) of subchondral bone (SCB) was calibrated by using the attenuation coefficient of two defined BMD phantoms of 0.25 and 0.75 g/cm 3 .…”
Section: Micro-ctmentioning
confidence: 99%