1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.1993.tb00541.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INFLUENCE OF ADULT BODY SIZE AND THE MALE PRONOTAL HORN ON PHENOTYPIC VARIATION IN ONTHOPHAGUS BINODIS THUNBERG (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE)

Abstract: The influence of adult body size and the male pronotal horn on phenotypic variation in offspring of the dung beetle Onthophagus binodis were examined in the laboratory. Female size predominantly determined the amount of dung provided to each brood mass, which had a significant influence on offspring survival. Large, horned males conferred a reproductive advantage to only large female parents through cooperation during brood mass production, increasing the average volume of their brood masses, offspring size, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Progeny size has been associated with non‐genetic traits such as the dung provision by adults (Cook, 1993; Juliano, 1985). Much of the variation in size within dung beetle populations is attributed to environmental pressure that is applied to the breeding adults (Fox & Czesak, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Progeny size has been associated with non‐genetic traits such as the dung provision by adults (Cook, 1993; Juliano, 1985). Much of the variation in size within dung beetle populations is attributed to environmental pressure that is applied to the breeding adults (Fox & Czesak, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provisioning of broods with greater amounts of dung influences the horn morphological traits and brood masses of dung beetles (Cook, 1988; Cook, 1990; Eberhard, 1982; Hunt & Simmons, 2000; Hunt & Simmons, 2004). Larger male beetles are able to provide more dung by working cooperatively with reproductive females compared with smaller beetles of the same species (Cook, 1988; Cook, 1993). We found, however, that there was no influence of dung pH on brood size (dry weight) and, thus, brood provisioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of them, elytral length has been frequently used for studies of coleopteran body size (e.g., Schmitz et al 2000 , Smith et al 2000 , Hernández et al 2011 , Knapp and Uhnava 2014 ). The other three have also been shown to be relevant with body size ( Cook 1993 , Smith et al 2000 , Fowler et al 2015 ). As we did not know which trait(s) would be most reasonable for rice water weevil, we first measured each of them and then screened for the best one using principal component analysis (see Statistical Analysis).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%