2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1002-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of adjuvant antibiotics on fistula formation following incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: a systematic review protocol

Abstract: Background Development of fistula-in-ano following incision and drainage (I&D) of anorectal abscesses occurs in over 30% of patients. It is associated with significant patient morbidity and societal cost. The use of antibiotics following drainage is controversial, with randomized controlled trials reporting opposing conclusions regarding their influence on the rate of fistula formation. Given the significant burden associated with their development, it is imperative to determine strategies to mini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple hypotheses exist. On the one hand, some believe that a course of antibiotics following drainage will reduce the odds of developing a fistula tract by eradicating residual infection especially in patients over 45 years [15]; but on the other hand, the results of a randomized trial reported opposing conclusions [16] which only highlights the need of a systematic review of the available literature in order to propose clear guidelines regarding the use of antibiotics following the drainage of a perianal abscess [17]. In this study, no association between the use of antibiotics and the risk of developing a fistula or a recurrence of the abscess was found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple hypotheses exist. On the one hand, some believe that a course of antibiotics following drainage will reduce the odds of developing a fistula tract by eradicating residual infection especially in patients over 45 years [15]; but on the other hand, the results of a randomized trial reported opposing conclusions [16] which only highlights the need of a systematic review of the available literature in order to propose clear guidelines regarding the use of antibiotics following the drainage of a perianal abscess [17]. In this study, no association between the use of antibiotics and the risk of developing a fistula or a recurrence of the abscess was found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the incisions were made at the sites of most fluctuance, and the abscess cavities were allowed to drain. Although there is no substantial evidence to support continued antibiotic use after drainage of perianal abscesses [ 15 ], authors recommend continued antibiotics in the immediate post-operative period in these rare scenarios, especially if systematic signs of infection such as fever are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Anglo-Saxon school, on the other hand, advocates simple incision in cases of a first abscess on the grounds that more than 60% of patients do not experience recurrence [2]. Moreover, recent literature suggests the utility of administration of an antibiotic after incision of a perianal abscess [3]. Indeed, predictive factors for the recurrence of abscesses have been reported, such as age, female gender, fever, high BMI, intake of corticosteroids, diabetes, and Crohn's disease (CD) [4][5][6]7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%