OBJECTIVES Patlents wlth GH deficlency frequently have multiple hormone deficiencies and require hydrocortisone replacement. We have investigated whether GH treatment alters circulating cortisol levels in hypopituitary patients recelving stable replacement therapy. DESIGN SubJects were studied during 6 or 12 months of S.C. GH at a dose of 0.25 IUlkglweek (0.125 IUlkglweek for the first 4 weeks), and efter a wash-out period of at least 2 months off GH (range 2-5 months). PATIENTS Fourteen hypopituitary patients (2F:12M) receivlng stable hydrocortisone replacement and thyroxlne, gonadal steroids and bromocriptlne therapy as required. MEASUREMENTS Serum cortisol values were measured throughout the day over 105 hours. Thyrold hormones and cortlsol binding globulin (CBG) were measured in the baseline sample. Comparisons of the serum cortlsol peak after receiving the flrst dose of hydrocortlsone, the tlme when the serum cortlsol peak was obtained, the area under the curve (AUC) for the cortlsol values and the levels of unbound cortisol on and off OH therapy were made. The results are expressed as mean * SEM.Comparisons were carried out within lndivlduals, uslng the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A P-value less than 0.05 was consldered statistically signlflcant. RESULTS During OH therapy, there was a significant reductlon in the mean cortisol peak (662.2f 61.1 vs 848.0 f 58.6 nmol/l; P = 0.001), and In the AUC for cortisol t (185.3 f 18.3 vs 230 * 17.9 nmol/l/l0~5h; P = 0.03), but there was no signlflcant change in the tlme of the cortisol peak (55.7 f 7.6 vs 57.8 f 4.9 minutes; P = NS). Durlng GH therapy there was a significant reductlon In CBG levels (33.64 i 1-16 vs 40-86 f 1-34mg/l; P = 0.001); however, no changes were found In the levels of calculated unbound cortlsol on and off GH (2.87f0.38 vs 2.90 f 0.30 nmol/l; P = NS). Durlng OH therapy, there was a slgnificant increase In serum trilodothyronlne (T3) (1.88 f 0.15 vs 1-44 i 0.11 nmol/l; P = 0-Ol), and a significant decrease in thyroxlne (T4) levels (74.9 * 11.1 vs 97.6 + i 10.9 nmol/l; P = 0.02) but levels remained within the normal range. No change was observed in serum TSH levels (0.29 f 0.13 vs 0.83 & 0.71 mU/I;CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that OH therapy In GH deflclent adults produces an alteration in the measured serum cortisol proflle, with a reduction in concentration of total cortisol in blood after rrally admlnlstered hydrocortisone. These changes in circulatlng cortlsol probably depend primarily on the fall in CBG levels, as no changes were found in the levels of calculated unbound cortisol on and off GH. Our data show that when measuring circulating cortisol levels, the results should be interpreted with caution in OH deflclent patients on GH replacement, and different criteria may have to be applied to the circulating cortlsol profile of these patients. The results hlghllght the importance of ensuring adequate cortlcosteroid replacement in patients starilng GH therapy. P = NS).