2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of acquisition parameters on the evaluation of mandibular third molars through cone beam computed tomography

Abstract: FOV size and number of basis images did not influence the evaluation of mandibular third molars and their relationship to the mandibular canal in the CBCT unit used. Conversely, smaller voxel size affected the assessment of contact between the tooth and the mandibular canal. In units in which voxel size does not influence radiation dose, the most appropriate CBCT protocol is the one using a smaller voxel size and delivering the lowest radiation dose to the patient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, LD‐CBCT image quality was considered sufficient for various orthodontic diagnostics (Brown, Scarfe, Scheetz, Silveira, & Farman, ; Cook, Timock, Crowe, Wang, & Covell, ; Hidalgo Rivas, Horner, Thiruvenkatachari, Davies, & Theodorakou, ; Ludlow & Walker, ; Portelli et al, ), for tooth autotransplantation planning (EzEldeen et al, ), and for preimplant radiographic assessment (Liljeholm et al, ). Although no dedicated LD‐CBCT protocols have yet been tested, there is evidence from the field of endodontics and periodontology demonstrating acceptable image quality with reduced kV, mA, and exposure time (Al‐Okshi, Theodorakou, & Lindh, ; Jones, Mannocci, Andiappan, Brown, & Patel, ; Lagos de Melo et al, ). Finally, in a bovine rib model, diagnostic accuracy of three customized CBCT protocols were compared regarding peri‐implant fenestrations and deshiscences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, LD‐CBCT image quality was considered sufficient for various orthodontic diagnostics (Brown, Scarfe, Scheetz, Silveira, & Farman, ; Cook, Timock, Crowe, Wang, & Covell, ; Hidalgo Rivas, Horner, Thiruvenkatachari, Davies, & Theodorakou, ; Ludlow & Walker, ; Portelli et al, ), for tooth autotransplantation planning (EzEldeen et al, ), and for preimplant radiographic assessment (Liljeholm et al, ). Although no dedicated LD‐CBCT protocols have yet been tested, there is evidence from the field of endodontics and periodontology demonstrating acceptable image quality with reduced kV, mA, and exposure time (Al‐Okshi, Theodorakou, & Lindh, ; Jones, Mannocci, Andiappan, Brown, & Patel, ; Lagos de Melo et al, ). Finally, in a bovine rib model, diagnostic accuracy of three customized CBCT protocols were compared regarding peri‐implant fenestrations and deshiscences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most likely, these outliers are attributed to individual measurement errors (EzEldeen et al, 2017), and for preimplant radiographic assessment (Liljeholm et al, 2017). Although no dedicated LD-CBCT protocols have yet been tested, there is evidence from the field of endodontics and periodontology demonstrating acceptable image quality with reduced kV, mA, and exposure time (Al-Okshi, Theodorakou, & Lindh, 2017;Jones, Mannocci, Andiappan, Brown, & Patel, 2015;Lagos de Melo et al, 2017). Finally, in a bovine rib model, diagnostic accuracy of three customized CBCT protocols were compared regarding periimplant fenestrations and deshiscences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite significant advances in the treatment of diseases in recent decades, no proper cure has been still found for some diseases such as cancer [1], [2], cardiovascular diseases [3], chronic pains [4], diabetes [5], autoimmune diseases [6], [7], AIDS [8], [9], and microbial infections [10], [11]. Some common microbial infections with bacterial origin are strongly annoying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy has met pre-established protocols for pre-surgical evaluation of third molars in this specific CBCT unit. 19 Nonetheless, it should be considered that the choice of the voxel size could interfere mainly in the cortical thinning evaluation, since images with larger voxels are more prone to the partial volume effect related to interpolation of data in a same slice. 20,21 Therefore, we believe that more studies might be delineated to investigate the influence of these parameters on JAR evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%