2020
DOI: 10.4491/eer.2019.409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of acidogenic fermented fish by-products with rice bran for sludge reduction and biogas recovery in anaerobic co-digestion

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of acidogenic fermentation broth with rice bran (RFFB), tap water (TFFB), or raw fishery by-products (FBs) on sludge reduction and biogas production in an anaerobic co-digestion process. Acidogenic fermentation of FBs with rice bran was faster and produced more volatile fatty acids than that with tap water. Reduction efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand, volatile solids, and total solids were highest in RFFB. In the kinetic analysis, λ (d), which repr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment was conducted at 35 °C, HRT of 30 days, and a mixing rate of 150 rpm, resulting in COD and total solids removal in the range of 30.4-83.8% and 25.3-77.9%, respectively. The methane production was in the range of 0.38-0.57 m 3 /kg VS (Choi 2021). In comparison with domestic and industrial sludge, methane production using AWW is low due to the lower amount of solid waste, especially if the waste is derived from traditional fish cultivation methods (Choudhury et al 2022).…”
Section: Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment was conducted at 35 °C, HRT of 30 days, and a mixing rate of 150 rpm, resulting in COD and total solids removal in the range of 30.4-83.8% and 25.3-77.9%, respectively. The methane production was in the range of 0.38-0.57 m 3 /kg VS (Choi 2021). In comparison with domestic and industrial sludge, methane production using AWW is low due to the lower amount of solid waste, especially if the waste is derived from traditional fish cultivation methods (Choudhury et al 2022).…”
Section: Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, research on the synergistic effects of increasing biogas production and reducing sludge through co-digestion with various co-feedstocks and sewage sludge is underway. Co-digestion is anaerobic digestion in which various co-feedstocks and sewage sludge are combined in a single anaerobic digester (Choi 2021). Codigestion is a viable option to increase methane yield and promote sludge reduction over anaerobic digestion with a single feedstock (Choi 2021;Jeong et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-digestion is anaerobic digestion in which various co-feedstocks and sewage sludge are combined in a single anaerobic digester (Choi 2021). Codigestion is a viable option to increase methane yield and promote sludge reduction over anaerobic digestion with a single feedstock (Choi 2021;Jeong et al 2019). The utilization of a co-feedstock with different chemical compositions, particularly with regard to nutrients, can improve the process due to the positive synergistic effect established in the digestion medium and the supply of scarce nutrients (Jhr et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations