2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of a velocity profile & support structure on tidal stream turbine performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their time-averaged LES results of the power coefficient exhibited regular pronounced fluctuations as a function of blade angle with the rotors upstream; in the RANS simulations, these were absent. The RANS models of Mason-Jones et al [67], however, did predict increased fluctuations in torque with blade angle when the stanchion supporting the turbine was included. The lesson here is that care must be used when deploying RANS turbulence schemes to capture transient behaviour in diagnostics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Their time-averaged LES results of the power coefficient exhibited regular pronounced fluctuations as a function of blade angle with the rotors upstream; in the RANS simulations, these were absent. The RANS models of Mason-Jones et al [67], however, did predict increased fluctuations in torque with blade angle when the stanchion supporting the turbine was included. The lesson here is that care must be used when deploying RANS turbulence schemes to capture transient behaviour in diagnostics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Their time-averaged LES results of the power coefficient exhibited regular pronounced fluctuations as a function of blade angle with the rotors upstream; in the RANS simulations these were absent. The RANS models of Mason-Jones et al [64] however, did predict increased fluctuations in torque with blade angle when the stanchion supporting the turbine was included. The lesson here is that care must be used when deploying RANS turbulence schemes to capture transient behaviour in diagnostics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Data for both horizontal-axis [1,33] and vertical-axis turbines [34] show there is a relationship between C P and C T . Although the relationship is non-linear, these data confirm that the thrust coefficient is greater than the power coefficient.…”
Section: Numerical Approach To Representation Of Turbinesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Mechanical losses will act to reduce the theoretical C P . Experimental tests of scaled horizontal-axis turbines by [1] recorded a maximum C P of 0.46 and a corresponding C T of 0.8 (for a blade pitch angle of 20˝) while the high resolution near-field modelling study of [33] recorded a maximum C P of 0.4 and a corresponding C T of 0.88 (for a blade pitch angle of 6˝). These values of C P and C T were recorded for particular flow speeds and C P and C T will vary with flow speed across the turbine.…”
Section: Numerical Approach To Representation Of Turbinesmentioning
confidence: 99%