1984
DOI: 10.1159/000260775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of a Single Intake of Various Test Meals on Secretion Rate, Buffer Effect, and Electrolytes of Human Stimulated Whole Saliva (Short Communication)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in persons who consumed exclusively sweet beverages, no associations was found. That is in accordance with previous reports (8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even in persons who consumed exclusively sweet beverages, no associations was found. That is in accordance with previous reports (8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…However, according to Table 5, demonstrating the results of stepwise analysis of regression, the protein variable did not fit into the model explaining most of the buffer variation. The result is in accordance with previous experimental studies (8)(9)(10), but at variance with others (6, 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the marked dietary changes, no obvious influence on the buffer effect of whole saliva was observed for the two consecutive 6-day periods with fasting and lactovege-tarian food. The present result is in agreement with those obtained after single intakes of vegetable juice as well as other test meals (5). These findings might suggest that an even longer adaptation period to dietary changes is required.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Dawes and Chebib (1972) found that flow rate was inde pendent of the day of the week and that it was increased when preceded by gustatory stimulation within less than about an hour prior to the saliva collection. In contrast, prior consump tion of a meal did not affect stimulated secretion rates (Heintze and Birkhed, 1984).…”
Section: Assessment Of Salivary Flow Ratementioning
confidence: 88%