2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-015-9951-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of a River Plume on the Distribution of Brachyuran Crab and Mytilid Bivalve Larvae in Saco Bay, Maine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although earlier field surveys reported mussel larvae only in the top few metres of the water column [ 45 ], subsequent to this study we have routinely retrieved them from as deep as 14 m in the Gulf ofMaine (Philip O. Yund 2012–2014, unpublished data), and bivalve larvae in general are common in the Northwest Atlantic down to 20 m or more [ 67 ]. Much smaller scale sampling around a river plume in the southwestern Gulf of Maine has provided evidence of this subduction mechanism [ 68 ]. However, we are sceptical that subduction results in across-shelf transport on the larger spatial scale of our study region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although earlier field surveys reported mussel larvae only in the top few metres of the water column [ 45 ], subsequent to this study we have routinely retrieved them from as deep as 14 m in the Gulf ofMaine (Philip O. Yund 2012–2014, unpublished data), and bivalve larvae in general are common in the Northwest Atlantic down to 20 m or more [ 67 ]. Much smaller scale sampling around a river plume in the southwestern Gulf of Maine has provided evidence of this subduction mechanism [ 68 ]. However, we are sceptical that subduction results in across-shelf transport on the larger spatial scale of our study region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River plumes usually have high nutrient content and support primary production and algal biomass (Mallin et al, 2005;Peterson and Peterson, 2008;Kudela and Peterson, 2009). The influence of river plumes on larval transport and survival is related with their tolerance to osmotic shocks and their capacity to move vertically through the water column and density gradients (Bloodsworth et al, 2015). Different taxonomic groups will have different conditions to move and survive within river-influenced environments (Bloodsworth et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of river plumes on larval transport and survival is related with their tolerance to osmotic shocks and their capacity to move vertically through the water column and density gradients (Bloodsworth et al, 2015). Different taxonomic groups will have different conditions to move and survive within river-influenced environments (Bloodsworth et al, 2015). Similarly, the influence of the river plume on sediments and benthos can be observed several (Forrest et al, 2007) to hundred (Grimes and Kingsford, 1996) kilometers from the river mouth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River plumes usually have high nutrient content and support primary production and algal biomass (Mallin et al, 2005;Peterson and Peterson, 2008;Kudela and Peterson, 2009). The influence of river plumes on larval transport and survival is related to their tolerance of osmotic shocks and their capacity to move vertically through the water column and density gradients (Bloodsworth et al, 2015). Different taxonomic groups will have different conditions to move and survive within river-influenced environments (Bloodsworth et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of river plumes on larval transport and survival is related to their tolerance of osmotic shocks and their capacity to move vertically through the water column and density gradients (Bloodsworth et al, 2015). Different taxonomic groups will have different conditions to move and survive within river-influenced environments (Bloodsworth et al, 2015). Similarly, the influence of the river plume on sediments and benthos can be observed several kilometers (Forrest et al, 2007) to hundreds of kilometers (Grimes and Kingsford, 1996) from the river mouth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%