2018
DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i4/111366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of a Mono-Frequency Sound on Bacteria can be a Function of the Sound-Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu et al (2016) indicated the possibility of increased release of chemical mediators of QS in sound-exposed endospores. We have also shown altered production of QS-regulated pigments in sound-exposed bacterial cultures (Kothari et al, 2017;Kothari et al, 2018). QS being an important regulator of virulence (Natrah et al ., 2011), any chemical or physical agents capable of modulating QS can be expected to modulate bacterial virulence too.…”
Section: Effect Of Sonic Stimulation On Bacterial Virulencesupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Liu et al (2016) indicated the possibility of increased release of chemical mediators of QS in sound-exposed endospores. We have also shown altered production of QS-regulated pigments in sound-exposed bacterial cultures (Kothari et al, 2017;Kothari et al, 2018). QS being an important regulator of virulence (Natrah et al ., 2011), any chemical or physical agents capable of modulating QS can be expected to modulate bacterial virulence too.…”
Section: Effect Of Sonic Stimulation On Bacterial Virulencesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Previously we have reported results of our in vitro experiments describing (a) effect of low power MW on microbial growth/metabolism (Kushwah et al, 2013), protein synthesis (Mishra et al, 2013), enzyme activity (Dholiya et al, 2012), exopolysaccharide production (Kushwah et al, 2013), toxin production (Ramanuj et al, 2015), quorum-sensing (QS) regulated pigment production (Chaudhari et al, 2014), etc. ; effect of sonic stimulation on microbial growth (Sarvaiya and Kothari, 2015;Shah et al, 2016), antibiotic susceptibility (Sarvaiya and Kothari, 2017), and QS-regulated pigment production (Kothari et al, 2017;Kothari et al, 2018). Mutagenic effect of MW has also been previously described by us (Gosai et al, 2013;Kothari et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Kothari et al (31), a speaker (Minix soundbar) was placed 15 cm away next to the cell tubes inside a glass box-shaped chamber (L: 250 x W: 250 x H: 150 mm). The stimuli consisted of sine tones played from the computer software NCH Tone Generator (https://www.nch.com.au/index.html) at 300 Hz and at five different SPLs (70, 76.5, 83, 87.5, 89.5 dB SPL) each for 48 hours.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants also have mechano-reception, and roots may alter their growth in reaction to certain vibrations and sounds [6]. The list of organisms that utilize sound also includes microbes: several studies have shown that microbes can respond to sound under laboratory conditions by changing gene expression and metabolism (e.g., yeast [7], bacteria [8]). In fact, physical transmission of information in soil comes with its distinct advantages, especially for microbes: it is extremely fast, energy-efficient, and potentially operating over larger distances compared to the limits imposed by the production and diffusion of chemical signals in soil [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%