Influence of a face-bow on oral health-related quality of life after changing the vertical dimension in the articulator: a randomized controlled trial. Part II

Stein-Lausnitz, Manja von; Schmid, Steffen; Blankenstein, Felix; Peroz, Ingrid; Beuer, Florian; Sterzenbach, Guido

doi:10.1007/s00784-017-2130-2

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The remaining studies were conducted in 28 countries from all continents. Sixteen publications provided no or very limited age information 20,25,26,29,32,41,46,48,55,64‐70 . Five publications did not provide gender information 19,32,33,71,72 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Functional oral health‐related quality of life impact: A systematic review in populations with tooth loss

Schierz

Baba

Fueki

2020

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patients perceive the impact of oral disorder in four major areas, the dimensions of oral health‐related quality life (OHRQoL) Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact. The functional aspect is essential given the need of chewing, biting, speech and swallowing. The objective of this study was to identify OHRQoL information for dental subjects with functional oral health problems. In a systematic review, distinct and clinically relevant groups of dental subject samples, in this study called “population groups,” with such functional OHRQoL information based on the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) were identified (PROSPERO registration: CRD42017064033). The search strategy was “Oral Health Impact Profile” or OHIP. Searches were conducted in the PubMed interface of the Medline database, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsyINFO on 8 June 2017 and updated on 14 January 2019. Published OHIP domain data of different versions were recalculated into OHIP‐14`s Physical Disability domain score, characterising the subject's Oral Function impact. 3,653 potentially abstracts were screened. We identified 78 publications reporting dimensional information on 154 subject samples with 52 populations. A typical mean functional impact for partially dentate subjects was 1.6 units on a 0 to 8 unit metric, while for edentate subjects, the mean functional impact was 2.6 units. The functional impact score ranged from 0 to 7.9 units with 50% of the patient samples located between 0.8 and 2.6 units. For the first time, we provide normalised and therefore comparable metric information about the functional OHRQoL impact for a substantial number of functional oral conditions.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sixteen publications provided no or very limited age information. 20,25,26,29,32,41,46,48,55,[64][65][66][67][68][69][70] Five publications did not provide gender information. 19,32,33,71,72 In these 78 publications, 154 samples met the inclusion criteria.…”

Section: Impaired Oral Function In Subject Populations Suffering From...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional oral health‐related quality of life impact: A systematic review in populations with tooth loss

Schierz

Baba

Fueki

2020

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One pair of master cast was mounted into semi adjustable Articulator HANAU Widevue (Whip mix, USA) using facebow (Whip mix, USA) setting and intraoral bite registration in maximum intercuspal position (fig 5) and the other pair of master cast was mounted into semi adjustable Articulator HANAU Widevue (Whip mix, USA)in mean settings and intraoral bite registration in maximum intercuspal position. [5] The wax patterns fabricated on both the articulators were sprued, invested with phosphate bonded investment material in the same casting ring followed by burnout and casting. After recovery, finishing of both the three unit full-metal prosthesis was done using metal finishing kit (DFS Finishing Kit).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, to minimize occlusal errors, maxilla should be related to the arbitrary hinge axis using facebow. 5,6 Ideally occlusal contacts in all posterior teeth are uniformly distributed and they should contact simultaneously. Clinically uneven pressure distribution on occluding teeth is due to nonuniform contacts created due to cuspal interferences.7…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF OCCLUSAL CONTACTS IN THREE UNIT FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE PROSTHESIS FABRICATED WITH & WITHOUT FACEBOW TRANSFER –IN VIVO STUDY

2022

pnr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The utility of facebow might reduce the occurrence of occlusal interferences in fabrication of three unit fixed prosthesis. There is a lack of data regarding the clinical usefulness of facebow in fixed prosthesis fabrication.The purpose of this clinical trial was to study and compare the occlusal interferences in three unit fixed prosthesis fabricated with and without facebow transfer.15 participants satisfying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected in this clinical trial. For each participant, 2 pair of three unit fixed prosthesis were fabricated. Prosthesis were fabricated one with and other without facebow transfer. The treatment involved single operator and single technician to minimize the error if any. After fabrication, the prosthesis were evaluated on the basis of the occlusal contacts and interferences of the three unit fixed prosthesis using a 40um articulating paper. The prosthesis with better occlusal contacts was cemented and the results were evaluated using chi square test.Nine out of 15 three unit fixed partial denture prosthesis fabricated using facebow transfer had reduced incidence of occlusal interferences. 6 out of 15 prosthesis fabricated without facebow transfer had reduced incidence of occlusal interferences. The results were evaluated using chi square test which was highly significant. (P>1), the three unit fixed prosthesis fabricated with facebow transfer had reduced no. of occlusal interferences.Taking into consideration of the complex and multiphase study design of the study with a finite number of participants and one specific arbitrary face-bow, the following result could be drawn as there is significant difference in three unit fixed partial denture prosthesis fabricated by the use of the arbitrary face-bow compared to a mean setting as compared to three unit fixed partial denture prosthesis fabricated without facebow transfer. The three unit fixed partial denture prosthesis fabricated with facebow transfer yields a better prosthesis and minimizes the harmful occlusal interferences as compared to the three unit fixed prosthesis fabricated without facebow transfer.Evidence based dentistry is needed to asses and abolish the unnecessary steps in clinical dentistry. Facebow is one such step which has been questioned for long by many clinicians and there is lack if clinical trials with its use in fixed prosthodontics. This study is to evaluated the importance of use of facebow transfer in fabrication of three unit fixed prosthesis.

show abstract

Establishing Occlusal Relationships

Sülün

2024

Removable Partial Dentures

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Influence of a face-bow on oral health-related quality of life after changing the vertical dimension in the articulator: a randomized controlled trial. Part II

Abstract: From the patient's perspective, remounting of CDs will be positively perceived, irrespective of the use of a face-bow.

Cited by 7 publications

References 36 publications

Functional oral health‐related quality of life impact: A systematic review in populations with tooth loss

Functional oral health‐related quality of life impact: A systematic review in populations with tooth loss

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF OCCLUSAL CONTACTS IN THREE UNIT FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE PROSTHESIS FABRICATED WITH & WITHOUT FACEBOW TRANSFER –IN VIVO STUDY

Establishing Occlusal Relationships

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About