1987
DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(87)90101-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of a calcium dependent protease inhibitor on platelet activation and secretion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, CI and CII inhibited calpain but not thrombin (Table 1). Consistent with previous studies (Rao et al, 1987;Alonso et al, 1989), leupeptin inhibited the activity of both calpain and thrombin. It is therefore unlikely that the effect of calpain inhibitors on neurite enhancement was mediated by thrombin inhibition.…”
Section: Specificity Of Protease Inhibitorssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Conversely, CI and CII inhibited calpain but not thrombin (Table 1). Consistent with previous studies (Rao et al, 1987;Alonso et al, 1989), leupeptin inhibited the activity of both calpain and thrombin. It is therefore unlikely that the effect of calpain inhibitors on neurite enhancement was mediated by thrombin inhibition.…”
Section: Specificity Of Protease Inhibitorssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…EDTA displays a high binding constant for zinc and a weak one for calcium and magnesium (about 1.5 times and 2 times, respectively) [11]. So, at the low concen- Leupeptin is also known to have inhibitory activity toward proteases involved in blood coagulation and fibrinolysis [14,15]. In the present study, leupeptin of 100 μ M could prevent blood coagulation, but the protease inhibitor containing 1 μ M leupeptin could not prevent coagulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In preparation for the present studies, we noted that when leupeptin was added directly into the platelet prothrombinase assay, it slowed the rate of conversion of prothrombin to thrombin. This inhibitory effect on prothrombin conversion was detected even at micromolar concentrations of leupeptin, and likely reflects the known inhibitory action of leupeptin on thrombin (Ruda & Scrutton, 1987;Rao et al, 1987;Brass & Shattil, 1988), decreasing feedback activation by nascent thrombin generated in the prothrombinase assay. Therefore, in order to avoid any unintended effects of leupeptin in the prothrombinase assays in the present study, leupeptin-treated and control platelets were first activated by incubation with the C5b-9 proteins (15 min, 37 °C), and then each was adjusted to the same final leupeptin concentration (20 ^M) upon dilution for assay of prothrombinase activity (see Experimental Procedures).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%