receptor-ligand interaction on the cell surface. 4 The cell wall provides plants with strength and rigidity but also constrains the activity and autonomy of individual cells. [5][6][7][8] Most cells remain attached to their neighbors throughout their life, but during a number of processes in the life cycle of a plant (e.g., germination, formation of stomata, organ and seed shedding) it is crucial that separation between neighboring cells takes place. 9
IDA and the IDL Proteins are Signaling MoleculesIDA has been shown to control floral organ cell separation (abscission), [10][11][12] given that specialized abscission zone (AZ) cells are present. 13 IDA and the five Arabidopsis IDL proteins have an N-terminal signal peptide (SP) that has been shown to direct GFP-fusion proteins of IDA, IDL1 and IDL3 to the periphery of onion cells. 10,14 Their small size and extra-cellular localization made us suggest that these proteins are ligands involved in cell-tocell communication. 10 The SPs of IDA and the IDLs should direct the proteins to the apoplastic space, by the default pathway for soluble plant proteins, 15 and enable a potential receptor interaction. In agreement with this, we show that plants harboring constructs designed to overexpress IDA or IDL1 without the SP displayed none of the phenotypes observed in 35S:IDA and 35S:IDL1 plants.
Receptor-ligand InteractionWe have previously proposed that IDA could be the ligand of the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RLK HAESA (HAE). 10,16 In our recent paper, we report that the double mutant of HAE and HAESA-LIKE2 (HSL2) has a block in floral abscission, a phenotype similar to that of ida. We also demonstrate that hae hsl2 is epistatic to 35S:IDA, providing genetic evidence that IDA, HAE and HSL2 act in the same pathway. We hypothesize that IDA can signal through both HAE and HSL2, but we can not say which of the two, or if both, receptors normally relay the IDA signal.When ectopically expressed all the IDL proteins were capable of inducing floral organ abscission. These results indicate that the IDL proteins are able to trigger abscission through the same cellular mechanism as IDA, and that the IDL proteins may function through similar signaling pathways. However, promoter-reporter gene constructs indicate that the IDL genes are expressed in diverse tissues and not only in the floral organ AZs, suggesting that their normal functions differ from that of IDA. Therefore it is probable that the putative IDL ligands can exert their effects both through an