2017
DOI: 10.1086/691143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflorescence and Flower Development in Musa velutina H. Wendl. & Drude (Musaceae), with a Consideration of Developmental Variability, Restricted Phyllotactic Direction, and Hand Initiation

Abstract: Premise of research. Inflorescence and flower structure in the Musaceae is unique in the Zingiberales. The inflorescence lacks the obvious cincinnus structure that characterizes the order, and the flowers are unisexual. Previous studies were conducted using cultivated varieties and were carried out with sectioned material, which does not permit accurate developmental descriptions. Developmental study of a wild species with modern methods addresses these shortcomings and provides more accurate descriptions. Met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early stage of inflorescence development, the female and male flowers are morphologically almost indistinguishable, with gynoecial (pistils) and androecial (stamens) parts of the flower developing in both, although with subtle differences in the pattern and the size of organ development (Kirchoff, 2017). Ultimately, however, whether the mature flower is female or male is not due to small differences in the pattern of organogenesis but rather is concerned with the size and fertility of the gynoecium and androecium in the flowers (Kirchoff, 2017).…”
Section: The Inflorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the early stage of inflorescence development, the female and male flowers are morphologically almost indistinguishable, with gynoecial (pistils) and androecial (stamens) parts of the flower developing in both, although with subtle differences in the pattern and the size of organ development (Kirchoff, 2017). Ultimately, however, whether the mature flower is female or male is not due to small differences in the pattern of organogenesis but rather is concerned with the size and fertility of the gynoecium and androecium in the flowers (Kirchoff, 2017).…”
Section: The Inflorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early stage of inflorescence development, the female and male flowers are morphologically almost indistinguishable, with gynoecial (pistils) and androecial (stamens) parts of the flower developing in both, although with subtle differences in the pattern and the size of organ development (Kirchoff, 2017). Ultimately, however, whether the mature flower is female or male is not due to small differences in the pattern of organogenesis but rather is concerned with the size and fertility of the gynoecium and androecium in the flowers (Kirchoff, 2017). By the time the developing inflorescence is about halfway up the pseudostem, the ovaries of female flowers have become longer than those of the male allowing female flowers to be distinguished from male Figure 1 Key pre-and post-fertilization processes in reproductive biology, leading to success or failure in producing a seedling.…”
Section: The Inflorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations