Morphological Structure in Language Processing 2003
DOI: 10.1515/9783110910186.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or co-implicative cognitive domains?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The third consequence arises from the sensitivity to graded semantic similarity between paradigms, as indicated by the opposite influences of the morphologically closer and more distant paradigms to which a compound word belongs. This is also in accordance with the converging evidence for the graded influence of semantic similarity in inflectional (Baayen & Moscoso del Prado Martín, 2003;Kostić et al, 2003;Ramscar, 2002) and derivational processes (e.g. Feldman, Barac-Cikoja, & Kostić, 2002;Feldman, Pastizzo, Soltano, & Francis, in press;Moscoso del Prado Martín, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The third consequence arises from the sensitivity to graded semantic similarity between paradigms, as indicated by the opposite influences of the morphologically closer and more distant paradigms to which a compound word belongs. This is also in accordance with the converging evidence for the graded influence of semantic similarity in inflectional (Baayen & Moscoso del Prado Martín, 2003;Kostić et al, 2003;Ramscar, 2002) and derivational processes (e.g. Feldman, Barac-Cikoja, & Kostić, 2002;Feldman, Pastizzo, Soltano, & Francis, in press;Moscoso del Prado Martín, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In summary, our approach succeeds in extending the ideas of Kostić (1991Kostić ( , 1995Kostić ( , 2001Kostić ( , 2003 and Kostić et al (2003) from inflectional to derivational morphology and compounds while at the same time using a more standard measure of the amount of information carried by a paradigm. Nevertheless, further refinements of the technique are anticipated to account for the fine-grained sensitivity to semantic relatedness as revealed by the semantic constraints on morphological family size and inflectional morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The insignificant effect of Case (in interaction with Relative Entropy) in the model for the simulated latencies is expected, given that we have no evidence suggesting that the distributional properties of the nominative case forms are very different from those of the oblique case forms. Since the nominative case carries the lowest number of functions and meanings compared to the other case endings (Kostić et al, 2003), and since in our model the different functions and meanings of the cases are not specified, with all cases being treated equal, no special advantage for the nominative can emerge.…”
Section: Modeling the Processing Of Case Inflections In Serbianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A person' s name like Martti occurs mostly in nominative singular. Same sort of analysis is given by Kosti et al (2003) for Serbian, although they seem to be hesitant about the semantic origins of the phenomenon. We shall not explore the semantic factors of case distribution any deeper, but analyze the distribution of cases on morphological level only.…”
Section: Distributions Of Word Formsmentioning
confidence: 90%