2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflation targeting at the crossroads: Evidence from post-communist economies during the crisis

Abstract: The objective of this paper is to assess if inflation targeting post-communist economies performed better, in terms of output growth, during the crisis than their non-inflation targeting counterparts. The paper also puts the issue in the context of the preconditions of inflation targeters to adopt this regime. post-communist economies of Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of IndependentStates are analyzed during the ongoing economic crisis. Results suggest that inflation targeters of those countri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, from a sample of 73 countries over the period 1980-2012, indicate that the degree of CBC robustly explains banking sector vulnerability, which is in line with the benign neglect hypothesis. On this respect, if the inflation targeting (IT) framework implies a narrower focus on the inflation stabilization objective, our results are in line with papers concluding that IT has some adverse financial and real effects (Petreski, 2014;Frappa and Mésonnier, 2010;Lin, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our results, from a sample of 73 countries over the period 1980-2012, indicate that the degree of CBC robustly explains banking sector vulnerability, which is in line with the benign neglect hypothesis. On this respect, if the inflation targeting (IT) framework implies a narrower focus on the inflation stabilization objective, our results are in line with papers concluding that IT has some adverse financial and real effects (Petreski, 2014;Frappa and Mésonnier, 2010;Lin, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This corresponds with the recent international evidence in favour of inflation targeting for both emerging and industrial economies, in the context of shock absorbing properties (Fratscher, Grosse-Steffen and Rieth, 2020), favourable conditions for capital inflows (Mollick, Torres and Carneiro, 2011), and stability of the banking system in countries with average quality of institutions (Fazio et al, 2018). However, there are empirical studies showing a very weak or non-existent support for inflation targeting (Petreski, 2014;Ryczkowski and Ręklewski, 2021). Among several disadvantages of inflation targeting, unfavourable output effects, inability to influence inflation expectations and ignorance of exchange rate levels are frequently mentioned (Ayres, Belasen and Kutan, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The Diffs-in-Diffs strategy and cross-country data from 1980 to 2007 were used to test this hypothesis (Abo-Zaid and Tuzemen 2012). According to Petreski (2014), during the economic crisis, inflation targeters perform better than non-targeters in terms of output growth. Moreover, Mollick et al (2011) employed a static panel data method to examine the effects of inflation targeting (IT) on output growth for the sample period of 1986-2004.…”
Section: The Recent Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%