2006
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2006/05/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflation models and observation

Abstract: We consider small-field models which invoke the usual framework for the effective field theory, and large-field models which go beyond that. Present and future possibilities for discriminating between the models are assessed, on the assumption that the primordial curvature perturbation is generated during inflation. With PLANCK data, the theoretical and observational uncertainties on the spectral index will be comparable, providing useful discrimination between small-field models.Further discrimination between… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

26
281
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
26
281
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They find that |f NL | is typically small in the socalled "horizon-crossing approximation", where the fields roll to their minima after inflation with values that are negligible compared to those at horizon crossing. The same conclusion was reached by Alabidi & Lyth [27], and by Kim & Liddle [43], who used the horizon-crossing approximation to compute the non-linearity parameters for multi-field models with monomial potentials. Recently, Battefeld & Easther [57] have extended the analysis of Vernizzi & Wands to an arbitrary number of scalar fields and have found the corresponding form of the non-linearity parameter f NL without assuming the horizon-crossing approximation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They find that |f NL | is typically small in the socalled "horizon-crossing approximation", where the fields roll to their minima after inflation with values that are negligible compared to those at horizon crossing. The same conclusion was reached by Alabidi & Lyth [27], and by Kim & Liddle [43], who used the horizon-crossing approximation to compute the non-linearity parameters for multi-field models with monomial potentials. Recently, Battefeld & Easther [57] have extended the analysis of Vernizzi & Wands to an arbitrary number of scalar fields and have found the corresponding form of the non-linearity parameter f NL without assuming the horizon-crossing approximation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It has recently become clear that a great deal of important information is encoded in the non-linearities of the curvature perturbation [15,16,17,18,19]. The lower-order moments of ζ are conventionally expressed in terms of the non-linearity parameters f NL [20,21,22] and τ NL [23,24,25,26,27], which respectively quantify the importance of the three-and four-point correlators of ζ relative to the power spectrum. To date, primordial non-gaussian features in the CMB have yet to be detected and the current upper bounds on the non-linearity parameters are |f NL | 10 2 [1,28,29] and |τ NL | 10 8 [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will assume that φ end M pl . If the higher-order terms in (2.58) are irrelevant when the pivot scale exits the horizon, then the spectral tilt and the tensor-to-scalar ratio are [215,216] n s − 1 = 2η 0 , (2.59)…”
Section: Slow-roll: Selected Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[67] The limit p → −∞ of [41] corresponds to an exponential potential like the one discussed in this article; however, no estimate of r and nT , which depend on the exponent α, were given, and the WMAP3 data set alone was used for comparison. This led Alabidi and Lyth to conclude that an exponential potential would be allowed at the 2σ level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%