2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2010.00932.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflation Dynamics in the New EU Member States: How Relevant Are External Factors?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Centered 3-year rolling window correlations (36 observations) have been calculated in order to gain insight into both the dynamics and importance of 11 The possible explanation for the pronounced significance of the domestic component of inflation in Romania could be the high inflation rates at the beginning of the sample period, occurring in the aftermath of a domestically-driven hyperinflation episode. Furthermore, Mihailov, Rumler and Scharler (2011b) argue that the importance of domestic vis-à-vis foreign factors is usually more pronounced in larger economies in the sample due to the so-called size effects, which seems to be the case here. The domestic component seems to be the most pronounced in two largest countries -Poland and Romania, while it is the least important in three smallest economies -Latvia, Lithuania and Croatia.…”
Section: Benchmark Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Centered 3-year rolling window correlations (36 observations) have been calculated in order to gain insight into both the dynamics and importance of 11 The possible explanation for the pronounced significance of the domestic component of inflation in Romania could be the high inflation rates at the beginning of the sample period, occurring in the aftermath of a domestically-driven hyperinflation episode. Furthermore, Mihailov, Rumler and Scharler (2011b) argue that the importance of domestic vis-à-vis foreign factors is usually more pronounced in larger economies in the sample due to the so-called size effects, which seems to be the case here. The domestic component seems to be the most pronounced in two largest countries -Poland and Romania, while it is the least important in three smallest economies -Latvia, Lithuania and Croatia.…”
Section: Benchmark Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To the best of the authors' knowledge, the only study formally comparing the relevance of domestic and external inflation drivers in the CEE economies is the one by Mihailov, Rumler and Scharler (2011b). They estimate the NKPC for 12 NMS (within the 2004 and 2007 enlargements), repeating the exact same empirical exercise as in Mihailov, Rumler and Scharler (2011a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the above equation (2), the actual inflation rate π t is calculated as the annual percentage change in the Retail Price Index (RPI), and g t represents the output gap computed as the deviation of real GDP from trend output based on standard Hodrick Prescott (HP) filter ( Gali 2002;Jondeau and Le Bihan 2005;Mihailov, Rumler, and Scharler 2011). 11 We also specify a model where the output gap is treated as unobserved and jointly estimate it with the other parameters of the model.…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%