2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1480896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflation and Monetary Regimes

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical line at 0.15 separates the LMG group from the HMG group: 58 countries reside to the left of the boundary, and 41 countries to the right. Like Gerlach (), Frain (), and Dwyer and Fisher (), we find that trueβ̂ rises and the confidence bounds shrink as countries with higher money growth are added to the sample. Further, we see that trueβ̂ remains well below 1.0 at money growth rates less than about 30%.…”
Section: Long‐run Cross‐section Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vertical line at 0.15 separates the LMG group from the HMG group: 58 countries reside to the left of the boundary, and 41 countries to the right. Like Gerlach (), Frain (), and Dwyer and Fisher (), we find that trueβ̂ rises and the confidence bounds shrink as countries with higher money growth are added to the sample. Further, we see that trueβ̂ remains well below 1.0 at money growth rates less than about 30%.…”
Section: Long‐run Cross‐section Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Teles and Uhlig () conjecture that widespread inflation targeting, whether tacit or not and beginning as early as 1990, was responsible for the breakdown in the money growth–inflation relationship among OECD countries after 1990. Dwyer and Fisher () report that the correlation between money growth and inflation is close to unity for high‐inflation countries, but that the correlation between money growth and inflation declines at lower rates of money growth, a finding that echoes Gerlach (). They also claim that when countries target inflation and the target is serially correlated, the correlation between money growth and inflation rises with time aggregation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%