2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflatable antenna for cubesats: Motivation for development and antenna design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several more manageable combinations are presented. For example, only 21.28 kw would be required for a spacecraft using a 10 m aperture (a size in line with work by Babuscia et al [42]) at a distance of 300 km. Problematically, the efficiency of hardware components required for operation at this frequency is comparatively (to 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz) low.…”
Section: Other Ways To Obtain This Benefitmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several more manageable combinations are presented. For example, only 21.28 kw would be required for a spacecraft using a 10 m aperture (a size in line with work by Babuscia et al [42]) at a distance of 300 km. Problematically, the efficiency of hardware components required for operation at this frequency is comparatively (to 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz) low.…”
Section: Other Ways To Obtain This Benefitmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A deployable set of solar panels for a high energy mission (such as one with significant data transmission power requirements) could, prospectively, take up several units (10 cm  10 cm  10 cm boxes) of space. Alternately, an inflatable antenna, such as that proposed by Babuscia et al [42] can fit in a single unit or less of space and provide (comparative to its predeployment space requirements) greater reception capabilities. This could allow the mission to have greater transmission power capabilities or reduce mission mass and volume requirements to fit within form factor and/or budgetary constraints (compared to the use of solar panels).…”
Section: Evaluation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology has been investigated for large antennas, but has not been adopted for any significant tlight projects. However, the relatively high stowage efficiency of an intlatable antenna combined with the greater risk tolerance of small satellites has stimulated renewed interest in intlatables [4]. FPR reflectarrays are a relatively new technology that provides a very significant reduction in stowed volume.…”
Section: Cubes a T Hga Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of deployable parabolic and parabolic like antennas have been developed in the past for CubeSats. Ideas have included a goer-wrap composite reflector 2 , a reflector transformed from the CubeSat body 3 , an inflatable parabolic reflector with reflecting material on one side and transparent material on the other 4 5,6 , and a reflectarray 7 . While these designs provide unique solutions, they are all designed to operate at S-band (with the exception of the reflectarray).…”
Section: Introduction/backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%