1998
DOI: 10.1006/clin.1997.4516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflammatory Potential of C-Reactive Protein Complexes Compared to Immune Complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both CRP and circulating immune complexes are potential activators of the classical complement pathway (21,22,33), and increased levels of both have been described previously in RA. CRP-mediated complement Figure 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both CRP and circulating immune complexes are potential activators of the classical complement pathway (21,22,33), and increased levels of both have been described previously in RA. CRP-mediated complement Figure 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…CRP bound to a ligand can activate complement, and there is evidence that CRP-mediated activation of complement occurs in RA (20). Both immune complexes and ligand-bound CRP activate complement via the classical pathway (18,(21)(22)(23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are related to C-reactive protein (CRP), which is a serum protein that contributes to host defense and is expressed during acute phase inflammatory responses in mammals (9). NPTX2 is homologous to neuronal pentraxin 1 (NPTX1, NP1) and neuronal pentraxin receptor (NPTXR, NPR), both of which have been characterized in nervous system tissues (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein resembles antibody and performs several functions associated with host defence: it promotes agglutination, bacterial capsular swelling and phagocytosis and activates the classical complement pathway through its calcium-dependent binding to phosphocholine (Romero et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%