2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2018.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biological behaviors of IMT and CD are typically benign or tend to exhibit benign traits, featuring imaging characteristics akin to those of benign tumors, often presenting spherical soft tissue shadows with clear boundaries. The maximum standard uptake value of these tumors in PET/CT imaging is significantly lower compared to that of GISTs ( 22 24 ). Lymphoma, characterized by relatively uniform mass density and unclear boundaries with the adjacent gastrointestinal wall, is rarely necrotic and is often accompanied by multiple lymph node enlargements in the small and large curvatures of the stomach, abdominal trunk, or mesentery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The biological behaviors of IMT and CD are typically benign or tend to exhibit benign traits, featuring imaging characteristics akin to those of benign tumors, often presenting spherical soft tissue shadows with clear boundaries. The maximum standard uptake value of these tumors in PET/CT imaging is significantly lower compared to that of GISTs ( 22 24 ). Lymphoma, characterized by relatively uniform mass density and unclear boundaries with the adjacent gastrointestinal wall, is rarely necrotic and is often accompanied by multiple lymph node enlargements in the small and large curvatures of the stomach, abdominal trunk, or mesentery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A study involving 5 patients revealed a heterogeneous standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of approximately 10.9, with this value being predominantly influenced by tumor cellularity, nuclear atypia, and a relatively high proliferative index [59]. However, SUVmax values for IMT vary significantly, ranging from 1.84 to 28.6, depending on the specific case [76][77][78]. The utility of this diagnostic tool extends to the detection of metastatic disease and the monitoring of response to treatment [79].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%